Blog Flux Directory Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines http://www.wikio.com Blog directory
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Mandy: Great blog!
Mark: Thanks to all the contributors on this blog. When I want to get information on the events that really matter, I come here.
Penny: I'm glad I found your blog (from a comment on Think Progress), it's comprehensive and very insightful.
Eric: Nice site....I enjoyed it and will be back.
nora kelly: I enjoy your site. Keep it up! I particularly like your insights on Latin America.
Alison: Loquacious as ever with a touch of elegance -- & right on target as usual!
"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it."
- Noam Chomsky
Send tips and other comments to: profmarcus2010@yahoo.com

And, yes, I DO take it personally

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

RNC: We don't need no ste-ee-enking accountability

just buzz off, will ya...?
After promising last year to search its computers for tens of thousands of e-mails sent by White House officials, the Republican National Committee has informed a House committee that it no longer plans to retrieve the communications by restoring computer backup tapes, the panel's chairman said yesterday.

The move increases the likelihood that an untold number of RNC e-mails dealing with official White House business during the first term of the Bush administration -- including many sent or received by former presidential adviser Karl Rove -- will never be recovered, said House Democrats and public records advocates.

[...]

Spokesman Danny Diaz said in a statement that the RNC "is fully compliant with the spirit and letter of the law." He declined further comment.

a promise...? just words... the big boss doesn't keep 'em, why should WE...?

Labels: , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

The most in-your-face criminal gang the world has ever seen

all effort to maintain even a pretense of accountability and respect for the rule of law has been abandoned...
The White House has acknowledged recycling its backup computer tapes of e-mail before October 2003, raising the possibility that many electronic messages — including those pertaining to the CIA leak case — have been taped over and are gone forever.

The disclosure came minutes before midnight Tuesday under a court-ordered deadline that forced the White House to reveal information it has previously refused to provide.

Among the e-mails that could be lost are messages swapped by any White House officials involved in discussions about leaking a CIA officer's identity to reporters.

Before October 2003, the White House recycled its backup tapes "consistent with industry best practices," according to a sworn statement by a White House aide.

Backup tapes are the last line of defense for saving electronic records.

Separately, the statement reveals the extent to which the White House is apparently unable to answer how many e-mails are missing from White House servers.

The White House "does not know if any e-mails were not properly preserved in the archiving process," said the statement by Theresa Payton, chief information officer for the White House Office of Administration. "We are continuing our efforts," said Payton, whose staff is responsible for the White House e-mail system.

If the e-mails were not saved, the White House might have violated two laws requiring preservation of documents that fall into the categories of federal records or presidential records.

yeah... well... ok... it was abandoned quite some time ago...

my fantasy...

scene: fade-in to white house conference room where george bush, dick cheney, and their senior staff aides are seated along one side of the table... across from them are seated select senior members of congress, the military, and the judiciary, who have jointly requested the meeting...

congressional spokesperson: thank you, mr. president for agreeing to meet with us and for gathering your senior officials on such short notice... let me get right to the point... we are here to demand your resignation and that of the key members of your administration... we are doing this under the full authority of the united states constitution... the supreme court has affirmed that we have this authority, and the joint chiefs of staff have agreed to provide us with the full backing of the united states military... our intent is not a takeover, but rather to restore the rule of law, adherence to the constitution with its mandated balance of powers, and the responsibility for accountability and oversight that the constitution has vested in congress... a caretaker administration has been appointed and is waiting to assume the day-to-day functions of running the government until such time as national elections can be scheduled, no later than six months from today... should you choose not to comply with this request, mr. president, the joint chiefs of staff have authorized the senior military provost marshall to detain you and your officials so that the caretaker government can be installed...


hey...! it's MY fantasy, and i'm stickin' to it...

just for fun, besides george and dick, who else would you want seated at the table...?

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Sunday, June 24, 2007

We're being studied and manipulated like lab rats



today's nyt...
President Bush has turned the executive branch into a two-way mirror. They get to see everything Americans do: our telephone calls, e-mail, and all manner of personal information. And we get to see nothing about what they do.

yeah...? and...?
Governments have to keep secrets. But this administration has grossly abused that trust, routinely using claims of national security to hide policies that are immoral and almost certainly illegal, to avoid embarrassment, and to pursue Mr. Bush’s dreams of an imperial presidency.

ferchrissake, nyt... you're laying out a thumbnail sketch of an out-of-control, criminal presidential administration, and THAT'S your conclusion...? how about a CALL TO ACTION, fercryinoutloud...? i'm tired of sitting around, blogging my ass off, wringing my hands, bemoaning the fate of my country...

WHEN THE HELL
ARE WE GOING TO
DO
SOMETHING...?

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Monday, June 18, 2007

Illegally doing lots of government business over political party email servers

some fairly mind-boggling additional information from waxman's house oversight committee...

first of all, the practice was widespread...

In March 2007, White House spokesperson Dana Perino said that only a “handful of officials” had RNC e-mail accounts. In later statements, her estimate rose to “50 over the course of the administration.” In fact, the Committee has learned from the RNC that at least 88 White House officials had RNC e-mail accounts. The officials with RNC e-mail accounts include Karl Rove, the President’s senior advisor; Andrew Card, the former White House Chief of Staff; Ken Mehlman, the former White House Director of Political Affairs; and many other officials in the Office of Political Affairs, the Office of Communications, and the Office of the Vice President.

secondly, the volume of useage was much heavier than was initially thought...
The RNC has preserved 140,216 e-mails sent or received by Karl Rove. Over half of these e-mails (75,374) were sent to or received from individuals using official “.gov” e-mail accounts. Other heavy users of RNC e-mail accounts include former White House Director of Political Affairs Sara Taylor (66,018 e-mails) and Deputy Director of Political Affairs Scott Jennings (35,198 e-mails). These e-mail accounts were used by White House officials for official purposes, such as communicating with federal agencies about federal appointments and policies.

third, deletion and destruction was undertaken on a wholesale basis...
Of the 88 White House officials who received RNC e-mail accounts, the RNC has preserved no e-mails for 51 officials. In a deposition, Susan Ralston, Mr. Rove’s former executive assistant, testified that many of the White House officials for whom the RNC has no e-mail records were regular users of their RNC e-mail accounts. Although the RNC has preserved no e-mail records for Ken Mehlman, the former Director of Political Affairs, Ms. Ralston testified that Mr. Mehlman used his account “frequently, daily.” In addition, there are major gaps in the e-mail records of the 37 White House officials for whom the RNC did preserve e-mails. The RNC has preserved only 130 e-mails sent to Mr. Rove during President Bush’s first term and no e-mails sent by Mr. Rove prior to November 2003. For many other White House officials, the RNC has no e-mails from before the fall of 2006.

and, in direct contravention of the presidential records act, it appears that gonzo knew of the destruction and did not act to enforce the law...
In her deposition, Ms. Ralston testified that she searched Mr. Rove’s RNC e-mail account in response to an Enron-related investigation in 2001 and the investigation of Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald later in the Administration. According to Ms. Ralston, the White House Counsel’s office knew about these e-mails because “all of the documents we collected were then turned over to the White House Counsel’s office.” There is no evidence, however, that White House Counsel Gonzales initiated any action to ensure the preservation of the e-mail records that were destroyed by the RNC.

not only does it appear that the presidential records act was violated, there was complete disregard for internal white house policy set forth in 2001 that was put in place specifically to insure compliance with the act...
To implement this legal requirement, the White House Counsel issued clear written policies in February 2001 instructing White House staff to use only the official White House e-mail system for official communications and to retain any official e-mails they received on a nongovernmental account.

why are these people still in office...? why haven't we stormed the white house with rakes and hoes, buckets of tar and sacks of feathers, and run the entire lot of them out of town on a rail...?

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Suing the White House over the missing emails

this is good... this is very good...
CREW’s suit is based on a FOIA request filed with the OA on March 29, 2007 for records regarding the over five million missing emails. Although on April 27, 2007, the OA agreed to expedite CREW’s FOIA request, the OA has yet to provide CREW with so much as a single document.

According to confidential sources, the OA created documents that detail the exact dates for which the over five million emails are missing and that analyzed the scope of the problem. CREW has learned that there is also a political assessment of the harm to public perception of the White House if it became known so many emails had disappeared. In addition, the requested documents include plans CREW was told were presented almost two years ago to restore the missing emails, but were never acted on.

Melanie Sloan, executive director of CREW said today, “This White House has decided to play an unlawful game of high-tech hide and seek with the American public. Thus far, CREW has learned that the Administration has both lost five million White House emails and pro-actively tried to cover up the loss. CREW has sued the Office of Administration to shine a spotlight on these reckless and possibly illegal activities and to restore these records for the benefit of future generations.”

keep pushing for accountability... keep pushing, pushing, pushing...

(thanks to raw story...)

Labels: , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Susan Ralston takes the 5th on Abramoff and White House RNC email accounts

so, she's got some goodies on jack and his relationship with the white house and his bestest friend, karl rove...
"The subjects this morning that she will be unable to testify to...are the subjects of the relationship between Jack Abramoff and his associates and White House officials, including Ms. Ralston, and the subject of the use by White House officials of political e-mail accounts at the RNC," Ralston's lawyer, Bradford Berenson said, during the May 10 deposition. "She has material, useful information about both of those subjects."

[...]

"She is more than willing to provide it to the committee. However, she will, as we have previously discussed, require a grant of immunity before she is comfortable going forward," Berenson also said in the deposition.

give her immunity and then waterboard her until she tells us everything she knows...

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

No confirmations without emails and, even then, look out

the longer gonzo stays on, the more folks are likely to leave, and the longer the white house stonewalls the emails, the longer the political appointment slots will stay empty...
Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (Vt.) and other top Democrats have indicated that they will not confirm any senior Justice nominees until they receive e-mails they have demanded from the White House and are allowed to conduct interviews about the firings.

otoh, if the emails are turned over, there's going to be some bruising confirmation hearings... either way, bushco is between a rock and a hard place... tough shit, ain't it...?

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Thursday, May 10, 2007

'S funny,wherever I look, there's a Rove

you keep it comin', murray... i'm counting on you to finally blow this thing wide open...
The Bush administration has withheld a series of e-mails from Congress showing that senior White House and Justice Department officials worked together to conceal the role of Karl Rove in installing Timothy Griffin, a protégé of Rove's, as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

and, if you happen to stumble across a pistol that's still warm...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

Patrick Leahy as Lieutenant Columbo



from TPMmuckraker...
Tired of waiting for a response, Senate Judiciary Chairman Pat Leahy (D-VT) issued a subpoena for any of Karl Rove's emails in the Justice Department's possession that might be relevant to the U.S. attorney firings. That includes emails sent from Rove's White House account (which apparently doesn't get much use) and emails from his account issued by the Republican National Committee.

now that we know that gonzo delegated away his hiring and firing authority, i'm sure leahy knows who exercised it, and it certainly wasn't sampson and goodling... when one ostensibly gives away one's power to relatively inexperienced staff political operatives to select highly experienced professionals, serious questions naturally arise... there seems no doubt that the REAL deciders were in the white house... this whole thing has smelled of karl rove from the get-go and, unless and until karl gets waterboarded into divulging what he knows, leahy's just going to have to continue with his peter falk, columbo routine...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Email technology - recovery and tracing

raw story has a terrific backgrounder on exactly how email works and how and why there's really no such thing as "missing" emails...

Labels: , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Push, push, push on the Bush

woo-hoo...! 3 (count 'em, 3) subpoenas... now that they're approved, will they be issued...?
"We have hit a brick wall with the Secretary of State," said Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA). "She will not propose a date to testify, she will not agree to testify, and she insists that our Committee be satisfied with partial information that was previously submitted to other committees."

Waxman's remark came in a fractious hearing on issuing three subpoenas. One sought Rice's testimony on May 15 concerning the intelligence used to justify the invasion of Iraq. The other two concerned the deletion of e-mails on accounts supplied the Republican National Committee and used by White House employees, as well as RNC documents concerning the use of the General Services Administration to assist Republican political efforts.

All three subpoenas were agreed to by the Committee.

while, as committee chair, waxman has the power to unilaterally approve and issue the subpoenas, he opened the matter to full committee debate and vote...
"Under the rules of this Committee, the Chairman has the power to issue subpoenas without debate or votes in the Committee. That is what Dan Burton used to do. In fact, that is what he did over 1,000 times," he said. "But I am taking a different approach today. I believe the entire Committee should have a chance to participate in the subpoenas we will consider today."

push, push, push on the bush...

[UPDATE]

according to this ap account, a subpoena will be issued to rice...
By 21-10, the House oversight committee voted to issue a subpoena to Rice...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Fine... Do it... Let's get it ALL on the table...

as a concerned citizen who has watched my country progressively going downhill for a long, long time, well before george and bill, i say, go for it...
"As Democrats gear up for a broad investigation of Republican e-mail accounts, GOP staff warn that the issue could come back to haunt Democrats, as the minority is looking for ways to extend the issue into Democratic e-mails as well," Paul Singer and Rachel Van Dongen write for Roll Call.

The paper reports, that "Brian McNicoll, a spokesman for Oversight and Government Reform Committee Republicans, warned that if Democrats want to broadly investigate the use of party e-mail accounts by administration officials, Republicans could extend this investigation back to the end of the Clinton administration as well."

"If you can go back through five years of e-mails, you can go back 10 years of e-mails,” McNicoll is quoted as saying. "The Clinton administration was doing this too — they were using e-mail accounts that were outside the presidential records system."

of course this was issued as a threat but i think it's a wonderful idea... if we're going to undertake the national cleansing we so desperately need, let's do it right and let the chips fall where they may...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Waxman's efforts get some unexpected, heavy-duty support

very good news...
[T]he Office of Special Counsel is preparing to jump into one of the most sensitive and potentially explosive issues in Washington, launching a broad investigation into key elements of the White House political operations that for more than six years have been headed by chief strategist Karl Rove.

The new investigation, which will examine the firing of at least one U.S. attorney, missing White House e-mails, and White House efforts to keep presidential appointees attuned to Republican political priorities, could create a substantial new problem for the Bush White House.

First, the inquiry comes from inside the administration, not from Democrats in Congress. Second, unlike the splintered inquiries being pressed on Capitol Hill, it is expected to be a unified investigation covering many facets of the political operation in which Rove played a leading part.

"We will take the evidence where it leads us," Scott J. Bloch, head of the Office of Special Counsel and a presidential appointee, said in an interview Monday. "We will not leave any stone unturned."

in the blinding-glimpse-of-the-obvious questions department, why the hell has it taken them 6+ years to smell the shitpile that has been accumulating outside rove's west wing office...?

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Monday, April 23, 2007

Go, Henry...!!

(this post is as much to tweak section9's nose as it is to report on waxman's latest inquiry...)
The head of the House Committee on Oversight and Governance Reform warned today of a "systematic failure" in basic security procedures as well as the safeguarding of classified information in the White House of President George W. Bush.

"Multiple current and former White House security personnel have informed my staff that White House practices have been dangerously inadequate with respect to investigating security violations, taking corrective action following breaches, and physically securing classified information," Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) wrote to former White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card today.

Waxman sought Card's cooperation in his probe of a "systematic breakdown" in White House security procedures.

i'm glad this is being followed up... after knodell's revelations at the scooter libby trial, and the recent disclosure that rnc servers were routinely used by numerous white house staff for official government communications, any it director would (and should) be crapping little green apples... the fact that it involves the white house and therefore the country's most sensitive classified information, is deeply troubling...

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Question of the day

i've been dying to steal atrios' superb and oh-so-simple format, and here's the perfect opportunity...
[S]hould a top campaign consultant with a history of electoral fraud be a systems administrator for federal government IT networks?


NO...

next question please...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Thursday, April 19, 2007

In an interesting twist to events, the DNC is suing the DOJ

i am at a loss to explain why the democratic national committee is the one filing suit... are they claiming to be the aggrieved party or is it simply a suit filed as an expression of the common interest, much like c.r.e.w. would do...? can anyone enlighten me here...?
The Democratic National Committee sued the Justice Department on Thursday, demanding it turn over any e-mail traffic with the Republican Party on the U.S. attorneys controversy and criminal investigations.

[...]

Democrats suspect that White House officials used e-mail accounts provided by the Republican Party headquarters to avoid a permanent record of communications with the Justice Department involving political considerations in the appointment of prosecutors.

The Democratic Party's suit in federal court followed the Republicans' refusal for now to turn over e-mails to Congress. White House lawyers first will have an opportunity to review them to determine whether some should be kept secret.

Such a review is "commonplace," said a letter dated Wednesday and released by the Republican committee. Attorney Robert Kelner, representing the RNC, sent the letter to the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Rep. Henry Waxman, a Democrat. Kelner gave no end date for the White House review.

another question is, does this help or hinder the work of the congressional investigation...?

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Show me the money

or, dating myself, "where's the beef...?"

patrick leahy...

"If the White House did nothing wrong, than show us. Show us the documents, provide us with sworn testimony, what was done, why, and by whom. If there's nothing to hide, the White House should stop hiding it," he said.


just for chuckles and grins, here's the late clara peller classic...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Monday, April 16, 2007

Yes, obstruction of justice charges would be nice



how about an indictment for turning political discourse in the u.s. into a screaming hate fest...? how about satan returning to claim the marker on your soul...?
A major government watchdog organization has warned that White House officials, including Karl Rove, could face a number of obstruction of justice charges for the way they used outside e-mail accounts and failed to properly archive e-mails on White House servers.

"[Special Counsel Patrick] Fitzgerald could decide to reopen the case," said Melanie Sloan, Executive Director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, referring to the probe over who leaked the identity of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson. "And if it turns out that e-mail was deleted from the RNC server as suggested by the Waxman letter, that could lead to new obstruction of justice charges."

such an odious human being is just crying out for appropriate consequences... oh, yes, the others too... ;)

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, April 13, 2007

Ok, here's what I don't get

if i stepped into a position like karl rove's, a deputy chief of staff to the president of the united states, i would be humbled by what i would consider to be a sacred obligation to serve my country in the most upstanding, ethical, squeakiest clean way possible, to serve as nothing less than a paragon of virtue that would bring honor to me, my boss, and my country... every single day, i would be cognizant that i was not there to serve anything other than the common good, and all that i did must meet that end... when i worked at united airlines, there was no question in my mind that we were there to provide a safe, reliable, efficient, economical, and fast way to move people and goods from one point to another...

yeah, i know there are lots of different kinds of people out there and it's evident that there aren't nearly enough who think like i do, but what, i would like to know, makes it such a difficult concept that it doesn't take root in the minds of our public servants...? it irritates the ever-loving shit outta me to have to read crap like this...

[I]n January 2006, special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald informed the Scooter Libby defense team that some of Rove’s emails from his White House account in 2003 were not saved as required by federal law.

[...]

The controversy surrounding Rove this week has involved his RNC email account. The RNC acknowledged that, while they instituted a new policy in 2004 to preserve emails, there appear to be no records from White House senior political adviser Karl Rove until 2005, leaving open “the possibility that Rove had personally deleted the missing e-mails.” According to the RNC, the Committee took action specifically and singularly against Rove in 2005 to keep him “from deleting his e-mails from the RNC server.”

one of the things foremost in my mind would be that everything i did would be part of the historical record, potentially available and open at any time to public scrutiny, something i would consider right and appropriate for someone serving as a steward of the public trust... i would be almost obsessive about making sure that records were properly kept, maintained, and accessible right from the moment i first set foot in my office... i guess that's just me...

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments