Blog Flux Directory Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines http://www.wikio.com Blog directory
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Mandy: Great blog!
Mark: Thanks to all the contributors on this blog. When I want to get information on the events that really matter, I come here.
Penny: I'm glad I found your blog (from a comment on Think Progress), it's comprehensive and very insightful.
Eric: Nice site....I enjoyed it and will be back.
nora kelly: I enjoy your site. Keep it up! I particularly like your insights on Latin America.
Alison: Loquacious as ever with a touch of elegance -- & right on target as usual!
"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it."
- Noam Chomsky
Send tips and other comments to: profmarcus2010@yahoo.com

And, yes, I DO take it personally

Friday, August 31, 2007

Chau, Snowjob

in all seriousness, if it's his cancer that's making a resurgence, i wish him well...
White House press secretary Tony Snow will step down Sept. 14, 2007, Fox News reported live on air Friday. CNN quickly confirmed.

Snow will be replaced by White House Deputy Press Secretary Dana Perino, who has occasionally done briefings for the President.

Labels: , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Saturday, July 21, 2007

One more... (I can't help myself...!)

booman...
Pelosi? Conyers? You listening?
"In circumstances like this, the constitutional prerogatives of the president make it futile and purely political for Congress to refer to a U.S. attorney a contempt citation," White House spokesman Tony Snow said yesterday. "The legislative branch is not in a position to compel action on the part of the executive branch, other than in areas related to its legitimate oversight role."

It's Inherent Contempt or it's the end of the Republic.

i don't think he's exaggerating one tiny bit...

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Expect george's behavior to become increasingly bizarre and erratic as the pressure mounts

can't you just visualize the scenario...? bush hollers for tony or ed... neither respond... his assistant tells him they're in a meeting... he demands to know what they're meeting about... his assistant tells him... he then demands to know WHERE they're meeting... his assistant tells him... he marches out of the oval office and down the hall, finds the room, and busts through the door...
President Bush shocked Capitol Hill staffers and Republican leaders Monday when he crashed a meeting at the White House to deliver a blunt message that he wasn't backing down on Iraq and Republicans need to understand that.

"It was stunning," said one GOP aide who attended the meeting. "We couldn't believe he came in."

"We kept looking at each other, amazed he came in," said another Republican aide.

Bush was described as folksy, adamant and mildly profane as he interrupted the meeting between senior White House communications staffers Tony Snow and Ed Gillespie and GOP leaders. His message: the policy on Iraq isn't changing. He is not backing down and no one on Capitol Hill should be confused into thinking he is letting up.

brace yourselves... it's going to get weirder and weirder...

Labels: , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Froomkin on Bush's "new phase" in Iraq

as dear leader prepares to announce his plan for a "post-surge phase" in iraq, dan froomkin offers us this...
[I]t's time to move the goalposts. Or, carrying the analogy further, to replace them with toothpicks.

meanwhile, as i said in the previous post, we ain't leavin'... you can bank on it...
A Bush administration report to Congress citing a lack of progress by the Baghdad government is "a look at the starting line" of the U.S. troop surge and shouldn't be used by critics to demand withdrawal, a White House spokesman said Tuesday.

"What Congress will get this week is a snapshot of the beginning of the retooling of the mission in Iraq," said Tony Snow, who defended the administration's war policy and argued that it's too soon to be talking about end-game strategies.

"Some of the benchmarks have been made, some of them haven't," he said. Snow confirmed the coming report would say that Iraq has not met all the benchmarks set for it. The nature of the report was revealed earlier to The Associated Press by a senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Rebuffing all such talk, President Bush said he won't succumb to political pressure. During a visit to Parma, Ohio on Tuesday, he reiterated that troop levels in Iraq "will be decided by our commanders on the ground, not by political figures in Washington, D.C."

ain't gonna happen...

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Monday, July 09, 2007

Up is down, black is white, dark is light, backward is forward, and shit doesn't stink

up...

nyt...

[I]nside the administration, debate is intensifying over whether Mr. Bush should try to prevent more defections by announcing his intention to begin a gradual withdrawal of American troops from the high-casualty neighborhoods of Baghdad and other cities.

down...

tony snow...

“There is no debate right now on withdrawing forces right now from Iraq,” Snow said.

black...

ruy teixeira...

Despite four months of a military surge in Iraq, 68 percent of the public either want to withdraw right away (25 percent) or begin bringing troops home within the next year (43 percent). Just 26 percent want to keep troops in Iraq “for as long as it takes to win the war.”

white...

karl rove...

Yesterday on NBC Nightly News, White House correspondent John Yang said that Bush’s senior political aide Karl Rove has apparently calculated that Iraq will not affect the 2008 elections. Rove, who spoke Sunday at the Aspen Ideas Festival, reportedly said “Iraq may not be a big issue in the next election because, he hopes, troops will be coming home by then.”

dark...

wapo...

n the Shiite Turkmen hamlet of Amerli, 50 miles south of the oil-rich city of Kirkuk, grief and anger mixed with bewilderment in the aftermath of one of the single deadliest attacks on Iraqis since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. Almost everyone seemed to have lost relatives or friends, if not entire families.

The death toll rose to more than 140, but 20 people remain missing, police officials said Sunday. More than 270 people were injured, they added.

light...

tony snow...

The new levels of attacks “fit a pattern that we see throughout the region,” he said, “which is that when you see things moving towards success, or when you see signs of success, that there are acts of violence.”

poverty is wealth, repression is freedom, crony capitalism is free enterprise, fear-mongering is leadership, obstruction of justice is openness, pollution is clean water and air... geeez, i need a lexicon of special terms just to keep up...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, July 06, 2007

Stop defending Clinton

.
Scooter Libby.......................Marc Rich

the virtually unquestioned article of faith in most of the liberal/progressive blogosphere goes like this...

Bush = bad; Clinton = good

it really should be more like this...


Bush = evil; Clinton = bad

the latest tortured response to yet another of the r's whiney, "well, clinton did it TOO," b.s. revolving around clinton's pardon of marc rich and 210 others in his last 9 weeks in office, is a case in point... today's progress report takes on tony snow, arguably a more adept purveyor of lies than scotty mcclellan, who, in a usa today op-ed, tries to justify bush's making a mockery of the entire american justice system... snow 1) minimizes the egregiousness of bush's action by noting the president's plenary constitutional powers (another subliminal plug for the unitary executive), and 2) makes the usual comparison with bill clinton... snow argues that since bush was acting in accordance with his executive powers, and that there was little investigation of clinton's pardons, why should bush be taking heat for commuting libby's sentence... the progress report rebuts by pointing out that "federal prosecutors concluded 'it wasn't appropriate to bring charges' in [Clinton's] case"...

dems, liberals and progressives need to stop defending bill clinton... just because he's a democrat, working overtime to make him look good doesn't add one whit to democratic credibility... it would be a LOT more honest to point out that clinton was acting within the same corrupt system that's still in place, and certainly held up his end by keeping it going for his eight years in office... the LAST myth we need to foster is that everything is going to be different when a democratic president takes office on 20 january 2009...

also, let's keep some of the facts on marc rich out in the open... while rich didn't obstruct an investigation into the outing of a cia agent and, on top of that, lie about it, rich isn't exactly a candidate for sainthood either...

marc rich...

In 1983, Rich and partner Pincus Green were indicted by U.S. Attorney and future mayor of New York City Rudolph Giuliani, on charges of tax evasion and illegal trading with Iran. Both of them fled to Switzerland before a court appearance, and they remained on the FBI's Most Wanted List for many years.

On January 20, 2001, hours before leaving office, President Bill Clinton granted Rich a presidential pardon. Since Rich's former wife and mother of his three children, socialite Denise Rich, had made large donations to the Democratic Party and the Clinton Library during Clinton's time in office, Clinton's critics alleged that Rich's pardon had been bought. Rich had also made substantial donations to Israeli charitable foundations. Clinton explained his decision by noting that similar situations were settled in civil, not criminal court, and cited clemency pleas from Israeli government officials, including Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Federal Prosecutor Mary Jo White was appointed to investigate. She stepped down before the investigation was finished and was replaced by James Comey. Though Comey was critical of Clinton's pardons, he could not find any grounds on which to indict him.

During hearings after Rich's pardon, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, who had represented Rich from 1985 until the spring of 2000, denied that Rich had violated the tax laws, but criticized him for trading with Iran at a time when that country was holding U.S. hostages. In his letter to the New York Times, Bill Clinton explained why he pardoned Rich, noting that U.S. tax professors Bernard Wolfman of Harvard Law School and Martin Ginsburg of Georgetown University Law Center concluded that no crime was committed, and that the companies' tax reporting position was reasonable. [New York Times, February 18, 2001][2]. In the same letter Clinton listed Libby as one of three "distinguished Republican lawyers" who supported Rich's pardon.

what we really need to face as a country is that we've got rot sprinkled liberally (pardon the very bad pun) throughout our government... it's become almost impossible to separate out the wheat from the chaff, but it's obvious as hell that there's enough power in congressional leadership to keep the status quo going for a very long time, and that's not even mentioning the horror that is the bush administration and their puppet makeover that is now our supreme court...

thanks to the daily show, here's a photo of the bed all these people sleep in...


Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Saturday, June 16, 2007

Another Kool-Aid Overdose

Think Progress has the Emergency Room Report.

Snow: President Bush Is ‘On The Frontlines’ Of The Iraq War ‘Every Day’

In today’s White House press briefing, reporter Helen Thomas asked Tony Snow if there are “any members of the Bush family or this administration in this war.” Stunningly, Snow claimed that President Bush is actually on the “frontlines” of the war in Iraq:

Q: Are there any members of the Bush family or this administration in this
war?

SNOW: Yeah, the President. The President is in the war every
day.

Q: Come on, that isn’t my question –

SNOW: Well, no, if you ask any
president who is a commander in chief –

Q: On the frontlines, where
ever…

SNOW: The President.


Labels: , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Solid reason vs. Rove's talking points on Gonzo

two major media outlets, more often than not known for defending (or at least not attacking) bush, aren't at all happy that gonzales is still in office...

USA Today

Blame monumental stubbornness, misplaced loyalty or failure to grasp reality. Whatever the reason, President Bush insists on keeping Alberto Gonzales, an old friend and legal adviser, as attorney general.

[...]

Monday's vote doesn't — and shouldn't — mean that the Gonzales case is closed. Questions about the prosecutors' firings remain, ones that can be answered only by White House officials, including political adviser Karl Rove.

The White House has said it will allow the officials to testify only in private, with no transcript and not under oath. That's flatly unacceptable.

The Senate Judiciary Committee has authorized subpoenas for the officials. Now it's time to get to the bottom of the White House role in the firings and, just as important, in running the department.

The Justice Department and the American people deserve better than a discredited, wounded attorney general. Even if the Senate can't muster enough votes to pass a no-confidence resolution, it's long past time for the president to channel his legendary loyalty away from his old friend and toward the public interest.

WaPo
[T]wo fundamental points: First, the president's apparently unshakable confidence in his attorney general is sadly misplaced. Second, the disturbing behavior uncovered in the investigation of the firing of U.S. attorneys cannot be dismissed as mere partisan politics, as much as the president would like to do so. Partisan politics was at work, yes, but in Mr. Bush's Justice Department...

[...]

Mr. Gonzales was the wrong choice to become the nation's chief law enforcement officer, and his conduct on the job has only served to underscore his unfitness.

meanwhile, george and the other loyal bushies stick to their scripted talking points...

our prez...

"This process has been drug out a long time, which says to me it's political," President Bush said yesterday. "There's no wrongdoing. . . . And therefore, I ascribe this lengthy series of news stories and hearings as political."

tony snow
...

The Senate took time out to perform a little political theater Monday.

[...]

Gonzales doesn't deserve this. He is a man of great dedication and integrity.

[...]

The best way ... to create the foundation for some comity and cooperation in the nation's capital — is to stop slinging mud and start rolling up sleeves.

Real work beckons.

and orrin hatch...
This is purely a publicity stunt, designed to put something on the president's desk to embarrass him.

[...]

The nation's business waits while this fishing expedition continues.

real work, stunt, theater, partisan, fishing expedition, slinging mud, politics, publicity, no wrongdoing, man of integrity... note them well... they're all the same, they're all from the dark and twisted mind of karl rove, and, for sure, you haven't heard the last of them...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Sunday, June 10, 2007

The White House middle finger - it's all part of the Bush endgame



no retreat, no negotiation, no compromise, no surrender... watch the white house strategy that was announced last October unfold before your very eyes...

from think progress...

On Fox News Sunday today, White House spokesperson Tony Snow said that if the no confidence vote is passed — even with bipartisan support — it will have “no effect” on President Bush’s confidence in Gonzales. Snow claimed “nobody [has] found anything untoward in terms of what happened” in the attorney scandal. He added, “there’s an attempt to pull this [resolution] like a piece of taffy, seeing if there’s any political advantage in it.”

tony's statement is completely in keeping with the strategy the bushies announced just prior to the november elections - they will fight everything to the bitter end, no compromise, no surrender... they are only doing exactly what they said they would do... if they show any sign of weakness now, the unity among the congressional r's will totally and completely collapse and the white house knows it... so, there is only one way around this impasse, and that's for congress to force the constitutional crisis they and the nation have been assiduously avoiding since the 12 december 2000 scotus decision that installed this coup d'etat as our so-called legitimate government...

it's been a while since i posted this, but i can see it's time for a reprise...

from time magazine, october 2006...

In fact, when it comes to deploying its Executive power, which is dear to Bush's understanding of the presidency, the President's team has been planning for what one strategist describes as "a cataclysmic fight to the death" over the balance between Congress and the White House if confronted with congressional subpoenas it deems inappropriate. The strategist says the Bush team is "going to assert that power, and they're going to fight it all the way to the Supreme Court on every issue, every time, no compromise, no discussion, no negotiation."

no one in the bush white house, particularly at this stage of bush's rapidly disintegrating administration, is going to risk displaying the slightest degree of responsiveness to any assertion of oversight or deference to the balance of powers... sure, there will be the occasional ceremonial tossing of someone to the wolves, but only when the circumstances are less than critical to the preservation of executive power... thus, wolfie's resignation, which had already passed outside the white house's ability to control... the same with john bolton... rumsfeld's sacking was designed to make it appear as though bush had things under control and was simply making a wise strategic decision... but there is no way, particularly now, after all the hue and cry, that bush could dispose of gonzo and not lose the sole remaining edge he has left, and that's not even taking into account the firewall function gonzo provides to bush and rove...

the white house is in the endgame and they know it... they're desperate as are the congressional r's, who fully realize that severing the tie with bush now would mean their doom as well... bush and his fellow criminals have driven up the stakes so high, there is no longer any retreat... all that remains is for the dems to find their cojones and get busy... the clock's ticking...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, June 01, 2007

Fond memories of Dan Bartlett

wow...! i just found out dan bartlett's leaving...! four and a half hours on the road this morning and look what i miss...! now, all we're left with is fond memories...



Stan and Ollie
Tony and Dan
preparing to land
in Baghdad
Well, here's another nice mess you've gotten me into.



Stan Laurel and
Oliver Hardy

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

Are there any consequences at all for the White House Press Secretary to tell outright lies?

no...

greenwald...

In February of this year, Tony Snow chatted with Bill O'Reilly and said this (h/t Zack):
Very quickly -- very quickly, you got this Valerie Plame case. Now, it turns out that [special counsel] Peter (sic: Patrick) Fitzgerald doesn't -- can't even identify any harm. She wasn't a covert agent. She wasn't compromised. . . She wasn't covert anymore.

Are there any consequences at all for the White House Press Secertary to tell outright lies like that? Does that prompt any media scandals? Why can Tony Snow say with impunity that Plame "wasn't a covert agent" when their own CIA confirms that she was?

this is only another reminder, as if we needed any, that the bush administration and its sycophants will say whatever they believe is necessary to maintain the wall of protection around the presidency... they have lenin's strategy down to a fine art...
"This administration, I've never seen an organization that learned the lessons of Lenin as clearly as these guys," said Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA) ... . "These guys must tack up Lenin's philosophy on their bedstand every night. Particularly when Lenin suggested if you say something often enough, with enough conviction, everybody will believe it."

greenwald continues...
Many people who listen to right-wing commentators such as these get their "news" about the world primarily, even exclusively, from these sources. And these sources, knowing that, routinely create their own self-affirming though wildly warped realities, in the process denying the most established facts or asserting propositions for which there is no factual basis.

[...]

But, as they so often do, they [make] them anyway, because those statements [help] to defend the Leader and bolster their political agenda. Most of all, they know that their readers will trust what they say even when those statements are demonstrably false.

and it works quite well, doesn't it...?

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Oopsies, Gonzo...! You can bet there's gonna be a phone call from George right quick...!

well, this oughta be interesting...

gonzo said...

Weeks after the White House ruled out the involvement of President George W. Bush in any discussions on the firing of 8 US Attorneys, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said on Thursday morning that the President had discussed the matter with advisers in an October 2006 meeting.

"I've now been made aware of the fact that there was a conversation with the President that basically mentioned the same thing in October of 2006," the Attorney General said while answering a question from Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA).

[...]

"Did the White House ask you to seek the removal of any US Attorney?" the Virginia Democrat asked.

"I have recollection of Mr. Rove raising concerns about prosecutors and voter fraud cases in three districts," Gonzales answered.

but dana said...
"I have said on the record for several weeks now that there is no indication that the President knew about any of the ongoing discussions over the two years, nor did he see a list or a plan before it was carried out," said White House Deputy Press Secretary Dana Perino on March 27, 2006.

but tony said...
A reporter ... clarified, "Just to follow, did you say, again for the record, that the President has no recollection of ever being asked about any of this?"

Snow answered, "Yes, the removal – yes, that is correct."

but dan said...
"[T]he President said, I've been hearing about this election fraud matters from members of Congress, want to make sure you're on top of that, as well," Bartlett told reporters.

But he insisted that the firing of US Attorneys was not discussed.

"There was no directive given, as far as telling him to fire anybody or anything like that. That would be under the prerogative of the Justice Department to take a look at those issues, as they obviously were doing," he said.

time to go get more popcorn...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

Eleven Congressional R's put their cards on the table for George - and KARL...????

tim russert on nbc news this evening, reporting on a meeting of 11 republican members of congress with bush yesterday...
Brian, the Republican congressman then went on to say, “The word about the war and its progress cannot come from the White House or even you, Mr. President. There is no longer any credibility. It has to come from Gen. Petraeus.”

well, that's pretty strong stuff, but, i'm sorry to tell you, brian... general petraeus, having been selected specifically for his willingness to be a white house sock puppet, doesn't have any credibility either...

attending the meeting...

The group of Republicans was led by Reps. Mark Kirk (R-IL) and Charlie Dent (R-PA), and the meeting included Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Karl Rove, and Tony Snow.

it just goes to show you where bush's head is at that, even in a meeting where he is being aggressively confronted by members of his own party on his increasingly disastrous course in iraq, his chief political advisor is in attendance...

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Saturday, March 24, 2007

An extraordinary diary about an even more extraordinary claim

is anyone but a precious few paying any attention at all to this kind of crap...?

devilstower, front-paged on daily kos...

When Tony Snow made the rounds of talk shows this week, some might have been surprised at his message.

Snow to CNN: "There's another principle, which is Congress doesn't have the legislative -- I mean oversight authority over the White House."

Snow to NBC: "Congress doesn't have any legitimate oversight and responsibilities to the White House."

Snow to NBC: "First, the White House is under no compulsion to do anything. The legislative branch doesn't have oversight."

Snow to ABC: "The executive branch is under no compulsion to testify to Congress, because Congress in fact doesn't have oversight ability."

Just in case you missed it the first time, Snow repeated himself to make sure the public gets the message: the White House has declared itself, a law unto itself, beholding to no other authority. This goes quite a bit beyond the already massive expansions of "executive privilege" previously claimed by this administration.

[...]

Though it may have passed as just another incidence of Snow being trotted forth to distribute the day's right wing talking points, what was said on Friday should not go without notice. This is the single more amazing declaration in an administration that has already produced more extraordinary claims than the fountain at Lourdes.

[...]

The only question now is whether we will drive them back to the bank, or admit that we are only play-acting at democracy.

the bush administration is only spelling out the logical extension of what they have set out for themselves since day one - absolute, total, unfettered executive power, controlling de facto totalitarian state... we either confront this constitutional crisis or we risk losing our country...

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Thursday, March 22, 2007

A clean elucidation of the "fuck you Congress" theory

from tony snow...
The executive branch is under no compulsion to testify to Congress, because Congress in fact doesn't have oversight ability.

from markos...
Interesting Constitutional theory.

It's also the cleanest elucidation of the "fuck you Congress" theory Bush has operated under the past 6 years.

it's certainly not news to any of us who have paid attention...

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Well, George, what do you have to say? For yourself, that is...

anything informative besides stamping your foot and having a little temper tantrum on national television...?
The extent to which President Bush knew of and was involved with the plan to fire eight U.S. attorneys in December is at the heart of whether he will be able to successfuly exercise executive privilege in fighting congressional subpoenas of White House aides, The Hill is reporting.

In an email exchange found among the 3,000 documents delivered to Congress by the Justice Department, Kyle Sampson, former chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, asked White House counsel Harriet Miers whether he had approval to move forward with the firings.

"Miers responded that she was 'not sure whether this will be determined to require the boss’s attention.' Her e-mail ended with the words: 'We will see. Thanks,'" reports the Hill. "Sampson, who resigned last week, responded with a critical question: 'Who will determine whether whether [sic] this requires the President’s attention?'"

The rest of the disclosed Justice Department documents do not provide evidence of whether the President was involved in those discussions. But since only two e-mails delivered to Congress were dated in the period between mid-November and December 4, it is believed that there may yet exist undisclosed e-mails from that period which provide answers.

having other people talk about what you knew and didn't know really isn't very helpful...
In response to a barrage of questions from reporters yesterday, White House spokesman Tony Snow said only that Bush had “no recollection of [the firings] ever being raised with him.”

seems to be a lot of memory issues popping up these days... fortunately, george doesn't have to reach back as far in time as scooter did...

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Monday, March 19, 2007

Patience, my ass

dear mr. president...

go.directly.to.hell...

"It can be tempting to look at the challenges in Iraq and conclude that our best option is to pack up and go home," Bush was to say, according to an administration official who saw an advance text of his remarks. "While that may be satisfying in the short run, the consequences for American security would be devastating."

White House press secretary Tony Snow went a step further, telling reporters in his morning briefing that a war spending bill up for consideration by the full House this week would "provide victory for the enemy." The legislation, in addition to providing funding for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan for the year, would effectively require the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq by the fall of 2008.

"That is not a fund-the-troops bill but a withdraw-the-troops bill," Snow said. "We think that is an approach that is conducive to defeat. It is a recipe for failure, not for victory. ... It would provide victory for the enemy and not the much-needed and deserved victory for the people of Iraq. Furthermore, it would forfeit the sacrifice that our troops have made in the field."

it may be TEMPTING to pack up and go home...? the reason it's TEMPTING is because it IS the best option...

it simply stretches all bounds of reason that they are still committed to this illegal and completely devastating war, four years in... oh, and btw, who is this "ENEMY" anyway...?

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, March 16, 2007

Tony defines "loyalty"

ok... now, read carefully, and keep count of the categories of importance...
[T]here's been a lot of conversation about loyalty. So let me -- I don't want to -- we'll just begin with a caveat: I do not know precisely what Kyle Sampson had in mind when he used the term.

But let me tell you how the term applies in this White House, which is that certainly we all serve at the pleasure of the president. We're loyal to the president in that sense. But the president's charge to each one of us is to do our jobs -- to do our jobs, to perform the public trust.

That also means to follow the principles and the priorities of the administration.

ready...? didja get 'em all...?

covering bush's ass and kissing it as required...


1) [W]e all serve at the pleasure of the president
2) We're loyal to the president in that sense
3) [We] follow the principles and priorities of the administration (see #'s 1 & 2)

serving as stewards of the commonwealth...


1) [P]erform the public trust

are we clear...? good...

Labels: , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Let the constitutional crisis begin!

the sooner, the better...
During a press briefing yesterday, presidential counselor Dan Bartlett signaled that the White House will fight congressional efforts to have Karl Rove testify about his role in the U.S. Attorney purge.
I find it highly unlikely that a member of the White House staff would testify publicly to these matters, but that doesn’t mean we won’t find other ways to try to share that information.

Press Secretary Tony Snow was also resistant:
Well, as you know, Ed, it has been traditional in all White Houses not to have staffers testify on Capitol Hill. So I think what we have been trying to do is to work in a way to be as forthcoming with members of Congress — you saw all the emails coming out today — give them all the information so that they can make a fair judgment about it.

fortunately, we have leahy...
Thankfully, Senate Judiciary Chairman Pat Leahy (D-VA) isn’t backing down. Last night on PBS, Leahy referred to Tim Griffen as Rove’s “acolyte,” and said he will “insist” that senior White House officials testify “in public, in sworn testimony, under oath“:
I intend to bring the attorney general up here. I am requesting several other people to come up here, certainly Mr. Sampson, Ms. Miers, I assume eventually Karl Rove. If they don’t come, then I’ll seek to subpoena them up here, because the story changes almost every time we pick up the newspaper. […]

What I want to find out is what happened, why we’ve been given different stories. And I want those answers, not in an informal briefing; I want those answers in public, in sworn testimony, under oath before my committee. As chairman, that’s what I insist.

< rubs hands together in fevered anticipation > can't wait...

(thanks to think progress...)

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

If Bush asks for Gonzales' resignation, he'd have to resign himself



'splainin', 'splainin', 'splainin', 'splainin'...
Embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Wednesday it's up to President Bush whether he remains in the administration and said he wants to stay and explain to Congress the circumstances surrounding the firings of eight U.S. attorneys.

Amid an escalating political row and calls from some Democrats for his resignation, Gonzales said, "I work for the American people and serve at the pleasure of the president."

"I think you can look at the record of the department in terms of what we've done ... going after child predators, public corruption cases," he said on NBC's "Today" show. "I think our record is outstanding."

[...]

Bush retains full confidence in the attorney general, spokesman Dan Bartlett, traveling with Bush in Mexico, said Wednesday. "He's a standup guy," Bartlett said of Gonzales.

alberto has so much dirt on george, he CAN'T let him resign... bush is going to sit tight, let gonzo keep on 'splainin', and letting tony snow and dan bartlett keep on issuing statements of presidential support... the only way anybody is going to do any truth-telling is under subpoena, and, if subpoenas are issued, it will spark the consitutional crisis we've been expecting for so long... bring it on, i say...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments