Blog Flux Directory Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines http://www.wikio.com Blog directory
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Mandy: Great blog!
Mark: Thanks to all the contributors on this blog. When I want to get information on the events that really matter, I come here.
Penny: I'm glad I found your blog (from a comment on Think Progress), it's comprehensive and very insightful.
Eric: Nice site....I enjoyed it and will be back.
nora kelly: I enjoy your site. Keep it up! I particularly like your insights on Latin America.
Alison: Loquacious as ever with a touch of elegance -- & right on target as usual!
"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it."
- Noam Chomsky
Send tips and other comments to: profmarcus2010@yahoo.com

And, yes, I DO take it personally

Sunday, July 08, 2007

"If he didn't act, it would have caused a fracture with the vice president."

michael isikoff, writing in newsweek, on bush extending clemency for scooter libby...
"I'm not sure Bush had a choice," says one of the advisers. "If he didn't act, it would have caused a fracture with the vice president."

i had to pick my jaw up off the floor when i read that sentence... could any statement given by anyone possibly be more crystal clear as to who is really acting as president of the united states...? it clearly is not george w. bush...

(thanks to raw story...)

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, July 06, 2007

More on the Marc Rich pardon vis a vis the Libby commutation

in a post earlier today, stop defending clinton, i was probably not as clear as i might have been about my criticism of bill clinton... let me say right off the bat, in no way whatsoever am i qualified to comment on the legalities or the process followed by bill clinton in his pardon of marc rich, nor, by the same token, am i qualified to comment on those same aspects of george bush's commutation of scooter libby's sentence... but i CAN comment on something else, something i believe is more important...

forget about the legalities, forget about executive powers of clemency, and forget about the validity of the charges - in the case of rich, or the conviction - in the case of libby... there is something more fundamental that no one is addressing... more than any other elected or appointed public official, the president of the united states should be expected to avoid even the APPEARANCE of impropriety... i don't want to hear reasons, i don't want to be subjected to finely-honed legal arguments... clinton's pardon of rich and bush's commutation of libby's sentence both reek of impropriety, and, therefore, they had no business doing either...

jeralyn, in her ususal cogent, lawyerly way, does a careful, point-by-point comparison of the two situations, but neglects to mention that BOTH presidents INVITED the uproar that followed their decisions... BOTH clinton AND bush made decisions that, given their connections with the two individuals in question, shouldn't have even been considered, and that, to me, is the entire issue in a nutshell... if it's going to be perceived as a compromise of your ethics, why would you want to do it in the first place...? i think we've got a pretty good idea why george let libby off the hook, but clinton was no less heedless of the fallout from his pardon of rich...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Stop defending Clinton

.
Scooter Libby.......................Marc Rich

the virtually unquestioned article of faith in most of the liberal/progressive blogosphere goes like this...

Bush = bad; Clinton = good

it really should be more like this...


Bush = evil; Clinton = bad

the latest tortured response to yet another of the r's whiney, "well, clinton did it TOO," b.s. revolving around clinton's pardon of marc rich and 210 others in his last 9 weeks in office, is a case in point... today's progress report takes on tony snow, arguably a more adept purveyor of lies than scotty mcclellan, who, in a usa today op-ed, tries to justify bush's making a mockery of the entire american justice system... snow 1) minimizes the egregiousness of bush's action by noting the president's plenary constitutional powers (another subliminal plug for the unitary executive), and 2) makes the usual comparison with bill clinton... snow argues that since bush was acting in accordance with his executive powers, and that there was little investigation of clinton's pardons, why should bush be taking heat for commuting libby's sentence... the progress report rebuts by pointing out that "federal prosecutors concluded 'it wasn't appropriate to bring charges' in [Clinton's] case"...

dems, liberals and progressives need to stop defending bill clinton... just because he's a democrat, working overtime to make him look good doesn't add one whit to democratic credibility... it would be a LOT more honest to point out that clinton was acting within the same corrupt system that's still in place, and certainly held up his end by keeping it going for his eight years in office... the LAST myth we need to foster is that everything is going to be different when a democratic president takes office on 20 january 2009...

also, let's keep some of the facts on marc rich out in the open... while rich didn't obstruct an investigation into the outing of a cia agent and, on top of that, lie about it, rich isn't exactly a candidate for sainthood either...

marc rich...

In 1983, Rich and partner Pincus Green were indicted by U.S. Attorney and future mayor of New York City Rudolph Giuliani, on charges of tax evasion and illegal trading with Iran. Both of them fled to Switzerland before a court appearance, and they remained on the FBI's Most Wanted List for many years.

On January 20, 2001, hours before leaving office, President Bill Clinton granted Rich a presidential pardon. Since Rich's former wife and mother of his three children, socialite Denise Rich, had made large donations to the Democratic Party and the Clinton Library during Clinton's time in office, Clinton's critics alleged that Rich's pardon had been bought. Rich had also made substantial donations to Israeli charitable foundations. Clinton explained his decision by noting that similar situations were settled in civil, not criminal court, and cited clemency pleas from Israeli government officials, including Prime Minister Ehud Barak. Federal Prosecutor Mary Jo White was appointed to investigate. She stepped down before the investigation was finished and was replaced by James Comey. Though Comey was critical of Clinton's pardons, he could not find any grounds on which to indict him.

During hearings after Rich's pardon, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, who had represented Rich from 1985 until the spring of 2000, denied that Rich had violated the tax laws, but criticized him for trading with Iran at a time when that country was holding U.S. hostages. In his letter to the New York Times, Bill Clinton explained why he pardoned Rich, noting that U.S. tax professors Bernard Wolfman of Harvard Law School and Martin Ginsburg of Georgetown University Law Center concluded that no crime was committed, and that the companies' tax reporting position was reasonable. [New York Times, February 18, 2001][2]. In the same letter Clinton listed Libby as one of three "distinguished Republican lawyers" who supported Rich's pardon.

what we really need to face as a country is that we've got rot sprinkled liberally (pardon the very bad pun) throughout our government... it's become almost impossible to separate out the wheat from the chaff, but it's obvious as hell that there's enough power in congressional leadership to keep the status quo going for a very long time, and that's not even mentioning the horror that is the bush administration and their puppet makeover that is now our supreme court...

thanks to the daily show, here's a photo of the bed all these people sleep in...


Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

E.J. Dionne on Libby: "Getting mad and staying mad"

he makes all the same points that have been made since bush's outrageous decision to commute libby's sentence and draws some of the same conclusions...
[I]s it possible to avoid concluding that this was a one-time-only action rooted not in law but in politics and favoritism for an aide who loyally misled the prosecution in a case that implicated top figures of Bush's own administration?

uh... < scratches chin > no...
As Michael Abramowitz reported in Tuesday's Post: "For the first time in his presidency, Bush commuted a sentence without running requests through lawyers at the Justice Department, White House officials said. He also did not ask the chief prosecutor in the case, Patrick J. Fitzgerald, for his input, as routinely happens in cases routed through the Justice Department's pardon attorney." Again: This was a one-time-only ticket for one guy.

[...]

[B]y keeping Libby free, Bush can conveniently postpone a full pardon until after the 2008 election. In the meantime, Libby has no incentive to tell prosecutors anything new about what happened in this case. As liberal blogs have noted [e.g. Daily Kos, here], since he was not pardoned outright, he can use the pending appeal of his conviction to avoid testifying before Congress.

not being one to peruse conservative blogs, dionne points out something that i find a trifle surprising, if not a wee bit encouraging...
"I'm not convinced that the administration should have intervened at all," [Ed Morrissey, a staunch conservative who runs the influential Captain's Quarters blog], wrote. "The sentence fit within the sentencing guidelines championed by Republicans for years as a bulwark against soft-on-crime federal judges, even if it was on the long end of the guidelines by some interpretations. The underlying crimes go to the heart of the rule of law, and those who commit perjury and obstruction should go to prison."

dionne concludes by asking the same question i've been asking just about every other day as some new bush administration outrage is uncovered...
This commutation is an ... outrage because it involves the administration taking steps to slip accountability for its own actions. Are we just going to let this one go by?

well...? are we...?

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Thursday, July 05, 2007

"I don't know what you mean by 'equal justice under the law.' "

huh...? 'scuse me...? would you mind running that by me again...?
From this afternoon's White House press briefing:
Q Scott, is Scooter Libby getting more than equal justice under the law? Is he getting special treatment?

MR. STANZEL: Well, I guess I don't know what you mean by "equal justice under the law." But this is a unique case, there's no doubt about that.

oh, it's unique, all right... unique in its complete and total disregard for our justice system and our proclaimed adherence to the rule of law, both of which bushco pays such lip service to both here and around the world...

Labels: , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, July 04, 2007

"Pissing on your leg and telling you it's raining"

kagro x...
[F]ollowing George W. Bush's pardon (let's be honest) of Scooter Libby, a Republican's admonition to let anything play out in court ought to be regarded as worth exactly squat.

So long as George W. Bush wields the pardon pen, there are no courts. And any Republican who tells you otherwise is pissing on your leg and telling you it's raining.

the ramifications of bush's commutation of libby's sentence are so huge, i'm still attempting to digest them... i've obviously still got a lot more digestin' to do...

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Hunter waxes eloquent on the Libby deal

and, believe me, nobody, and i mean NOBODY, can wax eloquent like hunter...

a teaser...

When seeking clemency for a criminal obstruction of justice, it is always considered a stroke of luck to have committed the obstruction on behalf of individuals with the power to grant such clemency.

read it all...

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Now that Libby's a done deal, how about some answers to THESE questions, George?

froomkin...
* Does the president approve of Libby's conduct?

* On whose behalf did Libby act?

* Did the White House make any sort of a deal with Libby or his defense team?

* What did Bush know and when did he know it?

* When did he find out that Karl Rove and Libby had both leaked Plame's identity? Before or after he vowed that any leakers would be fired? Did anyone lie to him about their role? Why didn't he fire them?

* How does the conduct of his aides comport with Bush's vow to restore ethics to the White House? How does the commutation?

* What factors did the president take into account in deciding to commute the sentence?

* What does the president consider an appropriate punishment for perjury and obstruction of justice?

* What was Cheney's role in the commutation?

take your time, george... don't rush... it IS, after all, the 4th of july, the day we celebrate the constitutional principles on which the united states was founded, and you no doubt would like to take some time to observe the day... otoh, do you suppose you could have some answers ready, say, by friday evening...? we know the tradition of the friday evening news dump, and, being a holiday week and all, maybe there won't be so many people crawling all over them then... whaddaya say...?

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Tuesday, July 03, 2007

Bush and Cheney must resign

keith olbermann, as usual, doesn't mince words... the pressure is building...



(thanks to crooks and liars... click here...)

i've been calling for bush and cheney and the entire cabinet to resign since i sat in front of my television set in buenos aires, in tears, watching the katrina disaster unfold... i never thought they would last this long, but, now it's time... they need to go...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

The previous post is even more important in light of THIS!

i'm tellin' ya, BURY THEM IN EMAILS... OVERLOAD THEIR INBOXES... TELL 'EM HOW YOU REALLY FEEL ABOUT HAVING CRIMINALS RUNNING THIS COUNTRY...
Today, House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. announced that he will be holding a full committee hearing next week titled, "The Use and Misuse of Presidential Clemency Power for Executive Branch Officials." The hearing will be held next Wednesday, July 11, at 10:15 am in the committee’s hearing room, 2141 Rayburn House Office Building.

"In light of yesterday’s announcement by the President that he was commuting the prison sentence for Scooter Libby, it is imperative that Congress look into presidential authority to grant clemency, and how such power may be abused," Conyers said. "Taken to its extreme, the use of such authority could completely circumvent the law enforcement process and prevent credible efforts to investigate wrongdoing in the executive branch."

MAKE THIS THE TIPPING POINT...! I THINK WE CAN DO IT...! THE TIME IS NOW...!

Labels: , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

This is not news

that the "decider" lives in a bubble by choice, not by necessity, is hardly the stuff for a page one headline... yeah, it sounds dramatic, and it panders to bush by fostering the notion that the burden of executive responsibility is heavy, but it also fails to point out that making decisions solely on the basis of discussions with those who have been carefully placed to shield you from reality has been the hallmark of the bush administration...
A Decision Made Largely Alone

By Michael Abramowitz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, July 3, 2007; Page A01

President Bush limited his deliberations over commuting the prison term of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby to a few close aides, opting not to consult with the Justice Department and rebuffing efforts by friends to lobby on Libby's behalf, administration officials and people close to Bush said yesterday.

the MUCH more interesting story would have been just exactly who WERE the "few close aides" and exactly WHEN was the decision made, which undoubtedly HAD to be well before the appeal board decision was announced... how otherwise to explain the fully prepared speech conveniently at hand...

Labels: , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

"America is not nearly as much fun if you aren't rich"

no comment necessary...

juan cole...

Libby was the Small Fish
Bush really Commuted the Sentences of Rove and Cheney


[...]

Basically, in Bushworld, high government officials are above the law, including all international law and most domestic. America is not nearly as much fun if you aren't rich.

Labels: , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

A reminder of why Scooter's sentence was not "excessive"

thanks to the liberal doomsayer, who offers us this reminder of just exactly what was behind scooter libby's conviction and why bush's decision yesterday is such a blatant mis-use of presidential power...

(note: the good stuff starts at 4:55...)


Labels: , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

The usual suspects weigh in with totally predictable opinions on Libby

there was a knock on my door late last evening... it was my daughter-in-law's mom coming to tell me in shocked tones that bush had commuted libby's sentence... not the most excitable of people and not, by any stretch, a news or politics junkie, she had been watching local news on a san francisco station and evidently the news announcers there were reporting bush's decision in thinly veiled outrage (not inappropriately, imho)... anyway, she was unusually agitated, which, i suspect, is a good thing... maybe it's starting to sink in to those among us who are not as news and politics-obsessed that we have a situation in this country that is seriously out of control...

from today's wapo editorialist...

The WaPo argues that President Bush's decision to commute Scooter Libby's entire prison sentence "sends the wrong message about the seriousness" of his offense. "We agree that a pardon would have been inappropriate and that the prison sentence of 30 months was excessive," the editors write. "But reducing the sentence to no prison time at all, as Mr. Bush did -- to probation and a large fine -- is not defensible" ... under the headline "Soft on Crime," the NYT argues that President Bush's decision underscores "the way this president is tough on crime when it's committed by common folk." The editors write that when the president was explaining his decision, he "did not sound like a leader making tough decisions about justice. He sounded like a man worried about what a former loyalist might say when actually staring into a prison cell" ... the Wall Street Journal, on the other hand, argues that the president didn't go far enough. By "failing to issue a full pardon," the editors write, "Mr. Bush is evading responsibility for the role his Administration played in letting the Plame affair build into fiasco and, ultimately, this personal tragedy" ... NYT columnist David Brooks argues that Bush's decision to commute Libby's sentence was "exactly right." "It punishes him for his perjury, but not for the phantasmagorical political farce that grew to surround him. It takes away his career, but not his family."

i'd summarize some of the more ridiculous and heavily spun verbiage for you, but you can do that for yourselves in 10-second eyeballing of the above...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Monday, July 02, 2007

Just a thought

somewhere, there's a tipping point for the bush administration... in my gut, i think bush's commutation of libby's sentence today may be it... i'm not capable of providing an extended rationale, but i have learned to trust my gut... in any case, we'll see, won't we...?

Labels: , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

"Enormous privileges that are not available to ordinary criminal convicts"

again, pathetic...
CNN's legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin said that "This is a complete departure from the usual procedure. Scooter Libby is getting a very special brand of justice. He is getting enormous privileges that are not available to ordinary criminal convicts."

and this is because scooter libby is a member of the elite, someone who's done the bidding of the elites, and done it well and without complaint... but, more than that, he doesn't put his pants on one leg at a time, and, even more importantly, his shit don't stink like the rest of us here in the peasant class... the proper rewards have to be given to members of the royal court...

(thanks to joe at americablog who also has the cnn video clip...)

Labels: , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Oh, no...! Our "rule of law" president insists on having the last word on Scooter.

pathetic...
President Bush spared former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby from a 2 1/2-year prison term on Monday, issuing an order that commutes his sentence.

Labels: , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments