Blog Flux Directory Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines http://www.wikio.com Blog directory
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Mandy: Great blog!
Mark: Thanks to all the contributors on this blog. When I want to get information on the events that really matter, I come here.
Penny: I'm glad I found your blog (from a comment on Think Progress), it's comprehensive and very insightful.
Eric: Nice site....I enjoyed it and will be back.
nora kelly: I enjoy your site. Keep it up! I particularly like your insights on Latin America.
Alison: Loquacious as ever with a touch of elegance -- & right on target as usual!
"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it."
- Noam Chomsky
Send tips and other comments to: profmarcus2010@yahoo.com

And, yes, I DO take it personally

Friday, November 30, 2007

Presidential extortion

happy holidays, all you government employees out there...! our president wants to hold your jobs and holiday shopping money hostage to his insanity... what a GUY...!
President Bush warned Congress yesterday that the Pentagon will soon have to start laying off civilian employees and reducing operations at U.S. military bases unless lawmakers send him an emergency war funding bill that does not mandate troop withdrawals from Iraq.

full disclosure: both my son and daughter-in-law, with whom i make my home when i am in the u.s., are civilian government employees, altho' not with the defense department...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Monday, November 05, 2007

WANTED: for criminal complicity, ignoring the U.S. Constitution, and violating oath of office


Democratic leaders in Congress are quietly preparing to give President Bush essentially everything he wants to keep the Iraq war going for at least another six months without forcing any change in course.

please make the bad people stop hurting me...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Thursday, September 27, 2007

At $500M a minute, Gates requests biggest war funding yet

war, war, war, war, and semi-trailer trucks full of money to support it...
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates asked Congress yesterday to approve an additional $42.3 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, bringing the Bush administration's 2008 war funding request to nearly $190 billion -- the largest single-year total for the wars so far.

[...]

The administration's funding request -- which came on the same day that the Senate voted overwhelmingly in favor of a nonbinding resolution calling for the split of Iraq into three semiautonomous regions -- would boost war spending this year by nearly 15 percent and would bring the total cost of both conflicts to more than $800 billion since Sept. 11, 2001, according to the Congressional Research Service.

and, to add an unfortunate note to the story, it was accompanied by this photo of troops training for iraq at ft. riley, kansas... note what i assume is a mannequin or dummy in the background, dressed (again, i assume) as an al qaeda terrorist...

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Monday, September 10, 2007

Ray McGovern gets thrown out of Petraeus' hearing for asking that Petraeus be sworn in

what in the holy hell would cause such sensitivity about petraeus being sworn in...?
It had dawned on me that when House Armed Services Committee Chairman Ike Skelton, D-Missouri, invited Gen. Petraeus to make his presentation, Skelton forgot to ask him to take the customary oath to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. I had no idea that would be enough to get me thrown out of the hearing.

[...]

I had not the slightest hesitation being sworn in when testifying before the committee assembled by Rep. John Conyers, D-Michigan, on June 16, 2005. Should generals be immune? Or did his masters wish to give him a little more assurance that he could play fast and loose with the truth without the consequences encountered by Scooter Libby.

i had so little interest in petraeus' testimony that i've barely followed the reports... i figured, rightly so, that the good general would only be spouting the bush administration approved line, and, from the little i've read, that was clearly the case... i'm dumbfounded, however, to find that ray mcgovern was expelled from the hearing for the mere suggestion that petraeus testimony should be given under oath... what the f*** is the matter with my country...?

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

MoveOn takes on Petraeus

moveon moves on bush's general...
General Petraeus is a military man constantly at war with the facts. In 2004, just before the election, he said there was “tangible progress“ in Iraq and that “Iraqi leaders are stepping forward.”

[...]

And last week Petraeus, the architect of the escalation of troops in Iraq , said ”We say we have achieved progress, and we are obviously going to do everything we can to build on that progress.”


Labels: , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

$50B more for Iraq? No, no, no, no, no, no...!

the man is insane for asking, and anybody who takes him seriously should be institutionalized right along with him...
Bush Wants $50 Billion More for Iraq War

President Bush plans to ask Congress next month for up to $50 billion in additional funding for the war in Iraq, a White House official said yesterday, a move that appears to reflect increasing administration confidence that it can fend off congressional calls for a rapid drawdown of U.S. forces.

and, of course, it's on page one of the wapo...

Labels: , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, July 27, 2007

"Initiating the impeachment process appears to be the only way to launch a shot across the bow of this particular ship of state"

the veteran intelligence professionals for sanity [Steering Group: David MacMichael, Tom Maertens, Ray McGovern and Coleen Rowley] met with dr. justin frank, author of Bush on the Couch, to formulate three possible scenarios for what our criminal president might do as the pressure to rein him in mounts...

frank's assessment of bush...

  • George W. Bush is without conscience, and it would require a lengthy series of clinical sessions to find out what happened to it. By identifying himself as all good and on the side of right, he has been able to vanquish any guilt, any sense of doing wrong.
  • George W. Bush seems also to be without shame. ... He does whatever he wants. ... He lies—not just to us, but to himself as well. What makes lying so easy for Bush is his contempt—for language, for law, and for anybody who dares question him.
  • Bush has a profound fear of failure and humiliation. He defends himself from this by any means at his disposal—most frequently with indifference or contempt. ... He will not change, because for him change means humiliating collapse. He is very fearful of public exposure of his many inadequacies.
  • The president’s contempt defense protects his belief system, a system he clings to as if his beliefs were well-researched facts. ... Helen Thomas has said that of all the presidents she has covered over the years, Bush is the least changed by his job, by his experience. This is why there is no possibility of dialogue or reasoning with him.
  • His certitude that he is right gives him carte blanche for destructive behavior. ... His comfort with cruelty is one reason he can be so jocular with reporters when talking about American casualties in Iraq.
  • Bush likes to break things, needs to break things. ... If George W. Bush wanted to destroy his own family, he could scarcely have done better. Thanks to him, no Bush is likely to be elected to high office for generations to come.
briefly, here are the three possible scenarios for the next 18 months that the vips and dr. frank constructed during the course of their discussion...
Scenario A: Destructive Attack on the Green Zone

[...]

[I]f there were an embarrassing attack on U.S. installations in the Green Zone or some other major U.S. facility, [Bush] would immediately order a retaliatory series of air strikes, and let the bombs and missiles fall where they may.

The reaction would come from deep within and would warn, in effect: This is what you get if you try to make me look bad.

Scenario B: Israeli Attack on Nuclear Targets in Iran.

With the U.S. Congress firmly in the Israeli camp, Cheney might see little disincentive to giving a green-light wink to Israel and then let the president “worry about cleaning up.” ... Senior U.S. military officers have warned against the folly of attacking Iran, but Cheney has shown himself, time and time again, able to overrule the military.

and what if impeachment hearings have begun...?
With impeachment under way, such senior officers might be reminded that all officers and national security officials swear an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States—NOT to protect and defend the president.

[...]

Psychologically, Bush would almost certainly need to join the attack, mainly to sustain his illusion of safety and masculinity. And Cheney, knowing that, would be pushing him hard on U.S. energy and other perceived strategic interests.

Scenario C: Congress Cuts War Funding This Fall

If Congress cut off funding for war in Iraq, Bush might well cast about for a casus belli to “justify” an attack on Iran.

Would the senior military again go along with orders for an unprovoked, unconstitutional war on a country posing no threat to the U.S.? Hard to say. [...] With Cheney egging him on from the wings of the “unitary executive,” but Congress no longer bowing to that novel interpretation of the Constitution, Bush will be sorely tempted to lash out in some violent way, if further funding for the war is denied.

sobering thoughts for a friday morning...

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

"Rather than all-night debates about resolutions that go nowhere..."

robert parry tells it like it is, bless 'im...


If the Democrats Want to Win...

By Robert Parry
July 18, 2007

If the Democrats really want to prevail over George W. Bush on the Iraq War and on his authoritarian vision of presidential powers, they would put back on the table two options that their leaders have removed: a cut-off of war funding and impeachment.

Rather than all-night debates about resolutions that will go nowhere, the Democrats would make the case to the American people that Bush has trampled on the Constitution; he has ensnared the nation in a catastrophic war by lying; and he has his eyes set on more dangerous chicanery in the months ahead.

The Democrats would explain that Bush has refused to compromise when offered the chance; he has told the people’s representatives that their only war role is to finance whatever "the decider" wants to do; he has declared that he has the right to ignore or break the law; he has engaged in cover-ups of serious wrongdoing by his subordinates and is now counting on his right-wing judicial appointees to protect him from oversight.

The Democrats would call on the American people to stand up at this dangerous moment in their history – when the president and vice president have become enemies of the constitutional system devised by the Founders, a Republic based on the idea that all people possess inalienable rights and governments must ensure those rights.

Never have a president and vice president abused the public trust to the extent that George W. Bush and Dick Cheney have. They have engaged in a consistent pattern of deception, not just political spin or cover-ups of petty matters, but lying about the most profound of issues, including war and the meaning of “freedom” and “democracy.”

[...]

[T]he reality is that Bush has eviscerated many of the most important civil liberties guaranteed by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

[...]

Psychologists may debate whether Bush is delusional or just an extremely accomplished liar, but either way he represents an unprecedented threat to the future of the American Republic and to the survivability of the planet.

So, what can be done?

If Bush is to be deterred, the country – and the Congress – must make clear that the public response will be commensurate to the threat personified by Bush and Cheney. In other words, half-hearted half-measures won’t do. The stakes must be raised and the battle joined.

Since Bush already has made clear he will spurn any constraining war resolutions from Congress, the Democrats must face up to their real options (aside from surrender): move to cut off war funding (beyond what is needed for an orderly withdrawal) and/or commence impeachment hearings for both Bush and Cheney.

i've been feeling particularly down in the mouth the last few weeks, watching the national dialog flirting with getting serious about the most critical crisis ever to face the united states, and then failing to go anywhere... i start to think that maybe it's my thinking that's awry, that i should join my more mainstream liberal colleagues and jump on the "out of iraq" bandwagon and continue to wring my hands over kristol, o'reilly, and michael o'hanlon... then i read robert parry and he snaps me back to my senses... hey, it's not like paul craig roberts doesn't do it for me, but robert parry has twice the investigative journalism credentials that roberts has... roberts is an insightful analyst who, i believe, has an intuitive grasp on the seriousness of our situation, but, reading parry is like hearing it from walter cronkite or edward r. murrow...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Thursday, June 07, 2007

Congressional Democrats failed or refused to exercise their basic powers to stop the war spending bill

lying and duplicity on full view at the last democratic debate...

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

"Weak and unwilling Democrats" - more insider crap

from a "purely political point of view"... one more example of how the elite insiders simply don't live in the same world we do... read this... read it carefully... then do a quick check on your emotions...
Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill played the issue like a Stradivarius. They forced a vote on a deadline for withdrawal from Iraq, putting Republicans on record supporting the status quo and President Bush, but allowed a subsequent vote to "fund the troops." That gave their own Members from swing districts the opportunity to demonstrate their support for the military.

From a purely political point of view, Democrats had their cake and ate it too. Yes, the war is unpopular, and opposing it is a no-brainer. But the one thing Democrats need to avoid is looking like themselves during the 1970s and 1980s -- weak and unwilling to support America's men and women in uniform.

[...]

So, in ignoring the demands of the party's left, Congressional leaders have kept their party right where they want it -- against the war but also against terrorists and for the troops.

[...]

Why take a chance alienating swing voters when the party already made its point by sending the president a deadline bill that he vetoed?

Anti-war critics of the Democratic Congressional leadership have nowhere else to go, both now and in November 2008.

Liberal bloggers apparently are angry with Democratic Rep. Mark Udall's vote for the supplemental, but they'll support him in next year's open-seat Senate race in Colorado. Similarly, the 2008 Democratic nominee for president will be more appealing to anti-war liberals than the Republican nominee will be, so the Democratic Party risks very little, at least at this point, in disappointing its most ideological, confrontational element.

so, how DOES it feel to be "ignored...?" how DOES it feel to be manipulated...? how DOES it feel to have those you went to the polls for last november take an illegal war and turn it into a "purely political" football...?

the democrats blew it... i won't go into big tent democrat's long and detailed explanations, and, besides, i doubt if i could do them justice anyway... but this i do know... "supporting the troops" means getting them the hell out of there and the democrats could - and should - have made that case and didn't... what they DID do is lose big-time, not just once, but twice... they not only bought themselves a war, lock, stock, and barrel, they also gave the head of our increasingly dictatorial state precisely the victory he wanted, along with more ammunition - pardon the very bad pun - to bolster his unitary executive bullshit...

let me be perfectly clear... our democratic leadership has a great deal more in common with bob novak (see previous post) than they do with me...

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Liberals and progressives "untroubled by debate and dissent"?

i never cease to marvel how dramatically some folks who, by virtue of their positions (in this case at a think tank, stanford's hoover institution), i thought would have their fingers much more on the pulse of the nation, don't... this hoover guy, peter berkowitz, writing in the wall street journal, seems particularly clueless...
The Conservative Mind
The American right is a cauldron of debate; the left isn't.

[...]

On a variety of issues that currently divide the nation, those to the left of center seem to be converging, their ranks increasingly untroubled by debate or dissent, except on daily tactics and long-term strategy. Meanwhile, those to the right of center are engaged in an intense intra-party struggle to balance competing principles and goods.

i don't know what he's smoking, but to say that the left isn't a cauldron of debate is flat-out wrong... the past few weeks, especially after the horror of the betrayal by the democratic leadership on the iraq war funding bill, have tossed liberals and progressives into an all-out civil war with their elected democratic leadership, and i can't see how he can write as if he's blissfully unaware of that... just listen to him blather on...
Democrats today are nearly united in the belief that the invasion has been a fiasco and that we must withdraw promptly. Indeed, rare is the Democrat (Sen. Joe Lieberman was compelled to run as an Independent) who does not sound like a traditional realist denying both America's moral obligation to remain in Iraq and its capacity to bring order to the country.

oh, well... i can only conclude that working in a conservative think tank and associating with only like-minded colleagues leaves you unprepared to confront the messy world of reality...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Sunday, May 27, 2007

"Today we lost. Tomorrow we will be back. Someday we will win."

brent budowsky in the huffpo...
Among many people, especially young people, there is sadness, outrage and anger that those they elected to Congress did not wage the fight and honor the election. There is a danger that young people conclude that elections don't matter.

[...]

I appeal to young people to keep the faith, make a stand, and continue the hard fight that we will ultimately win, because 70 percent of Americans are with us.

[...]

Today we lost.

Tomorrow we will be back.

Someday we will win.

brent... i turn 60 this december... i have been working, watching, and waiting my entire life for the kinds of major changes that we so desperately need in our system to come about... to be sure, the past 6 1/2 years have been particularly appalling as we watch the constitutional foundations of our republic under relentless assault, but it didn't begin with the 12 december 2000 scotus decision, not by a long shot...

sadness, outrage and anger don't begin to describe the intensity with which i view our current situation... the democratic performance on the war funding bill is only one in a long series of "last straws..." for quite some time, i have been avoiding the belief that the only way to accomplish needed change in this country was to take to the streets... now, i'm convinced it may indeed be the only way...

if a real leader stepped forward, one with access to a national platform, one with credibility, one untainted by the whirling cesspool that is our elected leadership today, who clearly identified the constitutional crisis we are experiencing and called us to action, my bags would be packed in a new york minute... while i have no intention whatsoever of giving up the fight, "someday we will win" is empty rhetoric that i have spent my life believing... i don't believe it any more... sorry...

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

We wanted Iraq, we've GOT Iraq, and it's never going away

bush has his fresh pile of money with no strings attached, so we can now prepare ourselves for the inevitable... september will come and go, the new year will come and go, next spring will come and go, the 2008 election campaign will shift into high gear and the party conventions will come and go, the new president will be inaugurated, and we will STILL be in iraq...
"I have tried to discourage my Republican colleagues from saying that September is some kind of seminal moment," said McCain. "I am aware the American people are frustrated. I share that frustration. I don't think the American people are aware of the consequences of failure."

january, february, march, april, may, june, july, august, september, october, november, december, january, february, march, april, may, june, july, august, september, october, november, december, january, february………………

we’re NEVER going to leave…

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, May 25, 2007

"We do not have it within our power to make the will of America the law of the land"

a quote that will live in infamy...

a cursory glance at today's home pages of the washington post and the new york times show sparse coverage of the intense feelings of anger and disappointment burning through the liberal/progressive grassroots and blogosphere about the dismal performance of what we thought was "our" democratic congressional leadership, the people we elected to the majority in large part to halt the illegal war in iraq...


After Victory on Hill, President Shifts Tone on Iraq

House, Senate Pass Iraq War Funding Measure


Congress Passes War Funds Bill, Ending Impasse

instead, most of the stories seem to take this tack...
[P]arty leaders vowed it was only a temporary setback in their efforts to bring home American troops.

[...]

[B]ackers said the bill's provisions -- including benchmarks for progress that the Iraqi government must meet to continue receiving reconstruction aid -- represented an assertion of congressional authority over the war that was unthinkable a few months ago.

how many times is it possible to hear statements like that before they cease to have any meaning whatsoever...? before, during and after the 2006 elections, the democratic leaders have consistently failed to demonstrate their understanding that the bush presidency is destroying our country, and it's not just about iraq... the actions taken by bush and his criminal colleagues in the past 6 1/2 years call for responses that reflect the utmost urgency but that is never what we hear... instead, we get this...
"We do not have it within our power to make the will of America the law of the land," [Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.)] said.

and there ya have it... the country we've been assured all of our lives was governed "by the people, for the people, and of the people", is nothing of the kind...

and, oh, yeah, opposition did get a few mentions...

  • Antiwar groups demanded that Democrats continue pressing for withdrawal dates and bombarded congressional offices with angry phone calls and e-mails in the hours before yesterday's votes.
  • Antiwar groups warned lawmakers who supported the spending bill that they could become election targets.
  • "We are moving backward," said Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.), a war opponent.
isn't it interesting how "antiwar" can be made to sound like a disparaging epithet rather than something noble...?

and then the unkindest cut of all...

The votes yesterday marked a rare moment of bipartisanship in an otherwise contentious and emotional debate.

i've grown to truly detest that word... it's become synonomous with "complicit..."

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Thursday, May 24, 2007

I am not a sports fan, never have been, never will be, but this says it for me

dear democratic leadership...



best regards,

profmarcus


(thanks to crooks and liars...)

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

The Iraq bill passes both houses - a pox on both of them

a twin disgrace of epic proportions...

first in the house...

In a 280-142 vote, the House passed a $120-billion Iraq war funding bill that contains no timeline to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq.

then in the senate...
[T]he Senate has passed the $100 billion Iraq war spending bill 80-14.

commenter...
HUGE miscalculation on these military complex enabling Dems. They grieviously misunderstood they are complicit in the crime of our generation and no amount of drivel and rationalization can erase that cold hard fact.

not that i didn't expect it, but i'm ill nonetheless...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Help Russ end the war? Sure, why not.

nothing ventured...

Dear Friend,

The latest version of the Iraq Supplemental Appropriations Bill is scheduled to come to a vote this week and I will not support it. It is a toothless measure that gives a blank check to the President and does nothing to end our involvement in Iraq.

We've made great strides in recent weeks and months in our combined effort to end one of the biggest mistakes in the history of our country and redeploy our brave men and women out of Iraq. That said, the President and some members of Congress, from both sides of the aisle, still haven't acknowledged the message the American people sent last November.

Last week the Feingold-Reid bill that would use Congress's 'power of the purse' to end the war in Iraq was voted on in the Senate. The procedural vote was another step forward in our effort. It put the majority of Senate Democrats on record calling for a firm end date for this misguided war, and I'm already looking for the next opportunity to push this important legislation forward. I'm continuing to fight every step of the way and today I'm asking you once again to help spread the message that the time for the war in Iraq to end is now.

Today, the Progressive Patriots Fund is launching a new online effort to promote awareness of my legislation and encourage individual initiative in reversing the reckless leadership President Bush has demonstrated through his Iraq policy.

[...]

Together, we can harness the power of the online community and force Congress to use its constitutional power to end this disastrous war.

Thank you for all of your support and for standing with me time and time again.

Sincerely,

Russ Feingold
United States Senator
Honorary Chair, Progressive Patriots Fund

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

“See, people have got to understand..." Earth to George: we DO understand

i think the american people very clearly understand the situation in iraq, and, moreover, are also coming to understand the massive criminal undertaking that has characterized the bush administration's 6 1/2 years in office...
Americans now view the war in Iraq more negatively than at any time since the war began, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.

Six in 10 Americans surveyed say the United States should have stayed out of Iraq, and more than three in four say that things are going badly there — including nearly half who say things are going very badly, the poll found.

Still, the majority of Americans support continuing to finance the war, as long as the Iraqi government meets specific goals.

President Bush’s approval ratings remain near the lowest point of his more than six years in office. Thirty percent of poll respondents approve of the job he’s doing overall, while 63 percent disapprove. Majorities of those polled disapprove of Mr. Bush’s handling of the situation in Iraq, of foreign policy, of immigration, of the economy and of the campaign against terrorism.

but our president is not going to budge... no sirree...
At a news conference in the Rose Garden this morning, President Bush seemed to acknowledge the erosion of public support for his administration’s policy in Iraq, even as he defended the policy. “Failure in Iraq affects the security of this country,” he said. “And it’s hard for some Americans to see that. I fully understand it. I see it clearly.”

Mr. Bush said he saw a need for “more of a national discussion” on “the consequences of failure in Iraq.”

“See, people have got to understand that if that government were to fall, the people would tend to divide into kind of sectarian enclaves much more so than today,” he said. “That would invite Iranian influence and would invite Al Qaeda influence, much more so than in Iraq today.”Beyond the war issue, the poll found widespread concern over the nation’s overall direction. More Americans — 72 percent — now say that “generally, things in the country are seriously off on the wrong track” than at any time since the Times/CBS News poll began asking the question in 1983. The figure had been in the high 60’s earlier this year.

i believe that, more than any other time in our nation's history, american citizens - you, me and everyone else who truly cares about our country - must rise up and be heard... it's obviously not enough to express ourselves in polls, blogs, letters to the editor, faxes, phone calls, emails, or, as we are finding out to our horror, in the voting booth... the country is crying out for a leader to step forward, someone who can command a national platform, someone with credibility, someone untarnished, someone who can serve as a catalyst, someone willing to galvanize the nation into action... we can't wait... is anybody out there...? please...?

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Stop The War

olbermann's special comment... extraordinarily powerful...



(click to play - wmv)

(thanks to crooks and liars...)

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Olbermann Special Comment tonight: "Compromised"

looks like he's going to tell it like it is...
Keith Olbermann will deliver a Special Comment tonight on the "compromise" struck between the Democratic leadership and the White House over the latest troop funding bill...

Here's a preview...
"The Democratic leadership has, in sum, claimed a compromise with the Administration, in which the only things truly compromised are the trust of the voters, the ethics of the Democrats, and the lives of our brave, and doomed, friends, and family, in Iraq.

You, the men and women elected with the simplest of directions - Stop The War - have traded your strength, your bargaining position, and the uniform support of those who elected you… for a handful of magic beans."

(from msnbc via think progress...)

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments