a quote that will live in infamy...
a cursory glance at today's home pages of the washington post and the new york times show sparse coverage of the intense feelings of anger and disappointment burning through the liberal/progressive grassroots and blogosphere about the dismal performance of what we thought was "our" democratic congressional leadership, the people we elected to the majority in large part to halt the illegal war in iraq...After Victory on Hill, President Shifts Tone on Iraq
House, Senate Pass Iraq War Funding MeasureCongress Passes War Funds Bill, Ending Impasseinstead, most of the stories seem to take this tack...[P]arty leaders vowed it was only a temporary setback in their efforts to bring home American troops.
[...]
[B]ackers said the bill's provisions -- including benchmarks for progress that the Iraqi government must meet to continue receiving reconstruction aid -- represented an assertion of congressional authority over the war that was unthinkable a few months ago.
how many times is it possible to hear statements like that before they cease to have any meaning whatsoever...? before, during and after the 2006 elections, the democratic leaders have consistently failed to demonstrate their understanding that the bush presidency is destroying our country, and it's not just about iraq... the actions taken by bush and his criminal colleagues in the past 6 1/2 years call for responses that reflect the utmost urgency but that is never what we hear... instead, we get this..."We do not have it within our power to make the will of America the law of the land," [Senate Majority Whip Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.)] said.
and there ya have it... the country we've been assured all of our lives was governed "by the people, for the people, and of the people", is nothing of the kind...
and, oh, yeah, opposition did get a few mentions...- Antiwar groups demanded that Democrats continue pressing for withdrawal dates and bombarded congressional offices with angry phone calls and e-mails in the hours before yesterday's votes.
- Antiwar groups warned lawmakers who supported the spending bill that they could become election targets.
- "We are moving backward," said Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.), a war opponent.
isn't it interesting how "antiwar" can be made to sound like a disparaging epithet rather than something noble...?
and then the unkindest cut of all...The votes yesterday marked a rare moment of bipartisanship in an otherwise contentious and emotional debate.
i've grown to truly detest that word... it's become synonomous with "complicit..."Labels: benchmarks, Bush Administration, Congress, Democrats, Dick Durbin, George Bush, House of Representatives, Iraq, Iraq war funding proposal, Iraq withdrawal, Republicans, timelines, US Senate
Submit To Propeller
[Permalink]
0 comments
