Blog Flux Directory Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines http://www.wikio.com Blog directory
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Mandy: Great blog!
Mark: Thanks to all the contributors on this blog. When I want to get information on the events that really matter, I come here.
Penny: I'm glad I found your blog (from a comment on Think Progress), it's comprehensive and very insightful.
Eric: Nice site....I enjoyed it and will be back.
nora kelly: I enjoy your site. Keep it up! I particularly like your insights on Latin America.
Alison: Loquacious as ever with a touch of elegance -- & right on target as usual!
"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it."
- Noam Chomsky
Send tips and other comments to: profmarcus2010@yahoo.com

And, yes, I DO take it personally

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

smell those red herrings

Here's a little more information shedding light on that recent contrivance, the National Intelligence Estimate:

from Pravda: "Russia and USA sign secret defense memorandum"


Deputy Defense Minister of the Russian Federation, General Yury Baluyevsky and his counterpart, U.S. Admiral Michael Mullen, signed a memorandum on defense cooperation in Washington.

The memorandum specifies the plan of defense cooperation and the compatibility of the armed forces of the two countries in 2008. It was a very fruitful, productive discussion that both parties benefited from, and the chairman desires to keep the content of those discussions between him and his counterpart,” Navy Captain John Kirby, a spokesman for Mullen, said."

It was former world chess champion Garry Kasparov that disclosed on HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher that:

[Russian President Vladimir] Putin makes an open friendship with Iranian President Amadenijad because Putin has but one item in his geo-political agenda: He needs high oil prices and tensions in the Middle East help him to keep oil prices at an all time high. So that's why he sells nuclear technology to Iran, he sells missiles to to Hezbollah and Hamas via Syria, because it helps Putin to stay in power. If the oil price goes down, the Putin regime goes down."

And from Garry Kasparov's WSJ op ed:
Opposition activists--or just those who happen to be in the way of the [Putin] administration--are harassed and arrested on false charges of drug possession, extremism, or the latest trend, for owning illegal software."

It is clear the 5th Estate has every intention of foisting the Telcom Immunity down our throats. It was clear that the PATRIOT Act was similarly concocted long before 911. It is clear that file-sharing is to be the next big bugaboo, like the drug laws against marijuana or the First Amendment abridgments against child pornography.

Striking a deal with Russia to target file-sharing as equivalent to Terrorism, would account for why the US Intelligence Community is willing to issue an NIE now admitting that Iran is of no imminent nuclear threat to the US. Such a secret deal is not beyond consideration. Yet the timing also reeks of a red herring to distract us from the Telcom Immunity shenanigans the 5th Estate is currently up to, including Sen. Arlen Specter's S. 2402, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Substitution Act.

Government and corporations have clearly already been invading privacy to snoop for private concerns such as the likes of RIAA and MPAA. The specter of making file sharing a giant bugaboo like government creates out of whole cloth in so many other areas, shows us well, what they are already likely up to.

Enough information has already been leaked to create a reasonable belief that virtually all electronic communications are already being intercepted, diverted and mined at some point for myriad purposes - most of which probably have little to do with preventing acts of terrorism, but rather intend to work all manner of machinations to serve ever-increasing political control by those who are already Haves.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Cafferty file: viewer comments on "redefining privacy"

additional thoughts after my post on the 11th and mettle's post of the 12th...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Unbelievable...! Our government says we should trust them with all of our private information...!

sure... take my credit card account numbers, my email and online chat records, my internet telephone conversations (i just concluded a two-hour business conference call linking myself, austin, texas, and buenos aires, argentina), my mobile phone calls, my atm withdrawals, my airline travel records, even my supermarket affinity card transactions... great god almighty, we simply MUST put a stop to this...!
A top intelligence official says it is time people in the United States changed their definition of privacy.

Privacy no longer can mean anonymity, says Donald Kerr, the principal deputy director of national intelligence. Instead, it should mean that government and businesses properly safeguards people's private communications and financial information.

it's so obvious, we are being desensitized to having our civil liberties taken away and our constitution rendered essentially meaningless...

(thanks to john at americablog...)

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Monday, July 30, 2007

Do I take it personally?

I wonder if most people are genuinely mad because they have been personally wronged, or if they are mad because the media tells them to be." -- from a comment at The Washington Post blog

[R]epeal [of the 4th Amendment] wouldn't mean a government camera in every bedroom." -- from a comment at The [very Right leaning] Volokh Conspiracy

DemocracyNow! has a new story about how Intelligence is largely farmed out to Corporatism. The Register reports that Bush is following up on the Attorney General's declaration that Big Brother must be given carte blanche instead of being limited to specific authorizations of existing technology. I guarantee you he is playing catch-up. They are already well out ahead of themselves.

People are being thrown off-track by being made to imagine that this is all about listening in on a few overseas phone calls. The Global Information Grid (Infosphere), is much larger than that. It surely includes total domestic spying. In ACLU, et al. v. NSA, et al. (.pdf), the court dismissed and said:

Even though the plaintiffs alleged a well-founded fear that their communications were subject to illegal surveillance, the court dismissed the case because plaintiffs could not state with certainty that they had been wiretapped by the National Security Agency."

Ok, so what do I care? How am I spied on? What is my empirical data? Well I have supposed the extent of spying for many, many, years. I have tried to live as much as I can as a "blank". I try as best as I can to conduct my life as anonymously as possible:

BENE QUI LATUIT BENE VIXIT" - Translation: (Latin) - He who has kept well in obscurity has lived well.

I would like to subscribe to a NEWS SERVER and/or a GLOBAL INTERNET TELEVISION SERVICE without notifying the government. I had a system worked out where a courier would travel a thousand miles distance for me and drop a cash payment in the mail from that far, to a provider. The last time I did this, the next day after the mail drop, the president announced an executive order that he was permitting government to now open mail.

Similarly, I obtained an anonymous debit card. The rules were immediately changed to require Social Security Numbers for debit cards as well as credit cards. These services now insist on credit card only accounts, never mind that on CASH, it says that it is good for all debts public and private. Who says that this is not total global & domestic spying?

Like I said previously, predictably, there will be diversion of information, it will be data mined and it will be used for political purposes.

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Monday, May 07, 2007

Getting comfortable with the domestic spying that's already been going on for years

the wapo comments on the proposed fisa "update..."

note the operative phrase in the snippet below...

[The revision to FISA] would go far beyond the administration's previously revealed warrantless wiretapping program, which, we are told, has now been put under court supervision.

didja catch it...? that's right... "we are told..."

and, ok, it ain't really an update, but a sweeping expansion of powers already proscribed under amendment 4 of the u.s. constitution......

The Bush administration, however, is seeking far broader changes in the law -- on which we would urge Congress to proceed with extreme caution. The administration says that it simply wants to modernize the law to make it "technologically neutral," applying equally to communications that take place through the air and by wire. Sounds sensible, but the administration proposes to deal with that problem in a way that could dangerously expand the scope of surveillance that the government could engage in free from court oversight.

oh, and then there's this...
The administration's proposal ... has no requirement that the person at the other end of the communication be a suspected terrorist.

what they're doing seems perfectly obvious to me... for some time, probably on the order of many years, the government has been conducting comprehensive "sniffing" programs via massively powerful computer systems and software that sweep through every byte of digital, voice, and video communication and all electronic transactions that are conducted in or routed through u.s. pipes... the "sniffing" software is programmed to detect certain words or patterns of words and certain code strings... if any of those appear, the communication, the source and the destination are grabbed and kicked out for further analysis...

the changes to fisa, as i see it, are intended to accomplish two things... one, they are trying to put their already-operational activities on at least a semi-legal footing... two, they are softening both congressional and public opinion to its existence, "prepping" us, as it were, for more to come...

for a number of years now, i've simply made the assumption that anything i do electronically through any kind of public or private network outside of my immediate control is available for government "sniffing," and i make that assumption whether i am inside or outside the country...

and, as i posted the other day, if there was every any doubt that mike mcconnell is one of the pod people, saying this should clear things up...

"Sir, the president's authority under Article II is in the Constitution," McConnell said. "So if the president chose to exercise Article II authority, that would be the president's call."

translation: bush is the commander in chief and the head of the unitary executive and, in time of war, is required to decide what is in the best interest of the national security of the united states even if violates part of the u.s. constitution...

so, class, for review... article II, sections 1, 2 and 4, and amendment 4...

Article. II. - The Executive Branch

Section 1 - The President

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice-President chosen for the same Term, be elected...

[...]

Section 2 - Civilian Power over Military, Cabinet, Pardon Power, Appointments

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

Section 4 - Disqualification

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

Article II and Amendment 4 of the U.S. Constitution vs. the extraordinary claims of George Bush

are we clear now on why bush nominated mcconnell to replace negroponte...?
Senior Bush administration officials said Tuesday that they believe the president still has the constitutional authority to continue his domestic wiretapping program without first seeking court approval.

"Senior U.S. administration officials have told the U.S. Congress that they could not promise that the Bush administration would fulfill its January pledge to continue to seek warrants from a secret court for a domestic wiretapping program," reports the International Herald Tribune.

In January, the administration agreed to seek court-approved warrants for all wiretaps of US citizens and other living inside the US.

But during a Tuesday hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Michael McConnell, the director of national intelligence, told Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI), that he could not promise that Bush would always seek warrants for domestic wiretaps.

"Sir, the president's authority under Article II is in the Constitution," McConnell said. "So if the president chose to exercise Article II authority, that would be the president's call."

what mr. mcconnell is saying, in effect, is that the president has chosen to interpret the united states constitution in a manner that suits his purposes... we are way, way past due to have this constitutional interpretation put to the test... the sooner we resolve this constitutional question and face up to the constitutional crisis our country has been experiencing since the coup d'etat was installed by the 12 december 2000 scotus decision, the sooner we can get on with our lives...
The United States Constitution

Article. II. - The Executive Branch

Section 1 - The President

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice-President chosen for the same Term, be elected...

[...]

Section 2 - Civilian Power over Military, Cabinet, Pardon Power, Appointments

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

article II does not make mention of the president's authority to undertake warrantless domestic spying activities... however, amendment 4 to the constitution definitely does, and not in its favor...
Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

can we please get this settled...? like tomorrow...?

meanwhile, let's not forget article II, section 4...

Section 4 - Disqualification

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Tuesday, May 01, 2007

According to Holtzman, Bush is keeping Gonzales to cover his ass

go-l-l-lee, who woulda thunk it...?
Former Democratic Rep. Elizabeth Holtzman, who sat on the House Judiciary Committee that investigated Nixon prior to his resignation, says President Bush may be sticking with embattled Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to avoid a confirmation hearing for his replacement.

well, duh...

but, wait, there's more...

Holtzman said the Senate could use confirmation hearings to investigate whether administration officials miscarried justice in firing US Attorneys on what Democrats say was largely political ground. Those hearings would serve the same role as the Watergate-era special prosecutor's investigation, Holtzman says, adding that the Senate "also might use the opportunity to probe the Justice Department's role in mistreatment of detainees, four years of flouting the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and other serious matters."

a-HA...! i've been saying all along that gonzo is part of george's firewall and have speculated repeatedly that, if he were removed, a large chunk of that firewall would be gone, leading to god-knows-how-many new revelations... looks like george is indeed feeling a draft blowing up his dress...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Saturday, April 14, 2007

Oh, yes, by all means, let's "allow the government to keep information obtained 'unintentionally' "

they've knocked themselves out earning our confidence and trust, i can't imagine anyone having any objections to this...
The Bush administration yesterday asked Congress to make more non-citizens subject to intelligence surveillance and to authorize the interception of foreign communications routed through the United States.

Currently, under the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, individuals have to be associated with a foreign terrorism suspect or a foreign power to fall under the auspices of the FISA court, which can grant the authority to institute federal surveillance. The White House proposes expanding potential targets to include non-citizens believed to possess, transmit or receive important foreign intelligence information, as well as those engaged in the United States in activities related to the purchase or development of weapons of mass destruction.

The proposed revisions to FISA would also allow the government to keep information obtained "unintentionally," unrelated to the purpose of the surveillance, if it "contains significant foreign intelligence." Currently such information is destroyed unless it indicates threat of death or serious bodily harm.

they've gotta go... all of 'em... please, dear lord, help us get rid of them while we still have a recognizable country...

Labels: , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, April 11, 2007

McConnell's first legislative proposal is to EXPAND government spying power

un-friggingly-believable...
President Bush’s spy chief is pushing to expand the government’s surveillance authority at the same time the administration is under attack for stretching its domestic eavesdropping powers.

National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell has circulated a draft bill that would expand the government’s powers under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, liberalizing how that law can be used.

i guess what you gotta do when you start making your first big move after taking office is kissing your boss's ass... nice work, mike... now, why don't you go back to booz allen...?

Labels: , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments