Blog Flux Directory Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines http://www.wikio.com Blog directory
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Mandy: Great blog!
Mark: Thanks to all the contributors on this blog. When I want to get information on the events that really matter, I come here.
Penny: I'm glad I found your blog (from a comment on Think Progress), it's comprehensive and very insightful.
Eric: Nice site....I enjoyed it and will be back.
nora kelly: I enjoy your site. Keep it up! I particularly like your insights on Latin America.
Alison: Loquacious as ever with a touch of elegance -- & right on target as usual!
"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it."
- Noam Chomsky
Send tips and other comments to: profmarcus2010@yahoo.com

And, yes, I DO take it personally

Sunday, July 08, 2007

"I have never before seen such consistent and marked disrespect on the part of the highest ranking government policymakers for both law and ethics"

this is worth posting in full...


Bush justice is a national disgrace
By John S. Koppel

The views presented in this essay are not representative of the Department of Justice or its employees but are instead the personal views of its author.

John S. Koppel has been a civil appellate attorney with the Department of Justice since 1981.


As a longtime attorney at the U.S. Department of Justice, I can honestly say that I have never been as ashamed of the department and government that I serve as I am at this time.

The public record now plainly demonstrates that both the DOJ and the government as a whole have been thoroughly politicized in a manner that is inappropriate, unethical and indeed unlawful. The unconscionable commutation of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's sentence, the misuse of warrantless investigative powers under the Patriot Act and the deplorable treatment of U.S. attorneys all point to an unmistakable pattern of abuse.

In the course of its tenure since the Sept. 11 attacks, the Bush administration has turned the entire government (and the DOJ in particular) into a veritable Augean stable on issues such as civil rights, civil liberties, international law and basic human rights, as well as criminal prosecution and federal employment and contracting practices. It has systematically undermined the rule of law in the name of fighting terrorism, and it has sought to insulate its actions from legislative or judicial scrutiny and accountability by invoking national security at every turn, engaging in persistent fearmongering, routinely impugning the integrity and/or patriotism of its critics, and protecting its own lawbreakers. This is neither normal government conduct nor "politics as usual," but a national disgrace of a magnitude unseen since the days of Watergate - which, in fact, I believe it eclipses.

In more than a quarter of a century at the DOJ, I have never before seen such consistent and marked disrespect on the part of the highest ranking government policymakers for both law and ethics. It is especially unheard of for U.S. attorneys to be targeted and removed on the basis of pressure and complaints from political figures dissatisfied with their handling of politically sensitive investigations and their unwillingness to "play ball." Enough information has already been disclosed to support the conclusion that this is exactly what happened here, at least in the case of former U.S. Attorney David C. Iglesias of New Mexico (and quite possibly in several others as well). Law enforcement is not supposed to be a political team sport, and prosecutorial independence and integrity are not "performance problems."

In his long-awaited but uninformative testimony concerning the extraordinary firings of U.S. attorneys, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales did not allay these concerns. Indeed, he faced a no-win situation. If he testified falsely regarding his alleged lack of recollection and lack of involvement, he perjured himself and lied to both Congress and the American people. On the other hand, if he told the truth, he clearly has been derelict in the performance of his duties and is not up to the job. Either way, his fitness to serve is now in doubt.

Tellingly, in his congressional testimony, D. Kyle Sampson (the junior aide to whom the attorney general delegated vast authority) expressed the view that the distinction between "performance" considerations and "political" considerations was "largely artificial." This attitude, however, is precisely the problem. The administration that Sampson served has elided the distinction between government performance and politics to an unparalleled extent (just as it has blurred the boundaries between the White House counsel's office and the attorney general's office). And it is no answer to say that U.S. attorneys are political appointees who serve at the pleasure of the president. The point that is lost on those who make this argument is that U.S. attorneys must not serve partisan purposes or advance a partisan agenda - which has nothing to do with requiring them to promote an administration's legitimate policy priorities.

As usual, the administration has attempted to minimize the significance of its malfeasance and misfeasance, reciting its now-customary "mistakes were made" mantra, accepting purely abstract responsibility without consequences for its actions, and making hollow vows to do better. However, the DOJ Inspector General's Patriot Act report (which would not even have existed if the administration had not been forced to grudgingly accept a very modest legislative reporting requirement, instead of being allowed to operate in its preferred secrecy), the White House-DOJ e-mails, and now the Libby commutation merely highlight yet again the lawlessness, incompetence and dishonesty of the present executive branch leadership.

They also underscore Congress' lack of wisdom in blindly trusting the administration, largely rubber-stamping its legislative proposals, and essentially abandoning the congressional oversight function for most of the last six years. These are, after all, the same leaders who brought us the WMD fiasco, the unnecessary and disastrous Iraq war, Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib, warrantless domestic NSA surveillance, the Valerie Wilson leak, the arrest of Brandon Mayfield, and the Katrina response failure. The last thing they deserve is trust.

The sweeping, judicially unchecked powers granted under the Patriot Act should neither have been created in the first place nor permanently renewed thereafter, and the Act - which also contributed to the ongoing contretemps regarding the replacement of U.S. attorneys, by changing the appointment process to invite political abuse - should be substantially modified, if not scrapped outright. And real, rather than symbolic, responsibility should be assigned for the manifold abuses. The public trust has been flagrantly violated, and meaningful accountability is long overdue. Officials who have brought into disrepute both the Department of Justice and the administration of justice as a whole should finally have to answer for it - and the misdeeds at issue involve not merely garden-variety misconduct, but multiple "high crimes and misdemeanors," including war crimes and crimes against humanity.

I realize that this constitutionally protected statement subjects me to a substantial risk of unlawful reprisal from extremely ruthless people who have repeatedly taken such action in the past. But I am confident that I am speaking on behalf of countless thousands of honorable public servants, at Justice and elsewhere, who take their responsibilities seriously and share these views. And some things must be said, whatever the risk.

i am proud to be an american when i see the kind of truth and courage displayed by mr. koppel... i realize he is putting his career on the line, but, dammit, that is what it's going to take to get these criminals out of the white house... their outlaw regime has been perfectly obvious for the past 6 1/2 years to anyone with two brain cells to rub together and i've been beginning to wonder who among those able to see from the inside what has been going on would find it in his or her heart to speak up... thank you, mr. koppel, for putting yourself out there, and thank you, denver post, for printing it... the united states needs all the help it can get right now...

(thanks to jcatcher at daily kos...)

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Sunday, July 01, 2007

Patrick Rogers, David Iglesias, the American Center for Voting Rights, and the Republican National Lawyers Association

so, not only was rogers pushing for iglesias to get the ax while at the same time agitating to be his replacement, he was also an officer (secretary) for the bogus american center for voting rights legislative fund...

noteworthy items from the article...

  • [Patrick Rogers, a] New Mexico lawyer who pressed to oust U.S. Attorney David Iglesias was [...] secretary of the non-profit American Center for Voting Rights Legislative Fund - an activist group that defended tighter voter identification requirements in court against charges that they were designed to hamper voting by poor minorities.
  • Iglesias, who was one of nine U.S. attorneys the administration fired last year, said that Albuquerque lawyer Patrick Rogers pressured him several times to bring voter fraud prosecutions where little evidence existed. Iglesias believes that he was fired in part because he failed to pursue such cases.
  • Rogers, a former general counsel to the New Mexico Republican Party and a candidate to replace Iglesias, is among a number of well-connected GOP partisans whose work with the legislative fund and a sister group played a significant role in the party’s effort to retain control of Congress in the 2006 election.
now, about that american center for voting rights, and its partner in voter suppression tactics, the republican national lawyers association...
  • [T]he American Center and the Lawyers Association were deployed in battleground states to press for restrictive ID laws and oversee balloting.
  • The Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division turned traditional voting rights enforcement upside down with legal policies that narrowed rather than protected the rights of minorities.
  • The White House and the Justice Department encouraged selected U.S. attorneys to bring voter fraud prosecutions, despite studies showing that election fraud isn't a widespread problem.
  • Public records show that the two nonprofits were active in at least nine states. They hired high-priced lawyers to write court briefs, issued news releases declaring key cities "hot spots" for voter fraud and hired lobbyists in Missouri and Pennsylvania to win support for photo ID laws. In each of those states, the center released polls that it claimed found that minorities prefer tougher ID laws.
  • Of the 15 individuals affiliated with the two groups, at least seven are members of the Republican National Lawyers Association, and half a dozen have worked for either one Bush election campaign or for the Republican National Committee.
  • "Their job was to confuse the public about voter fraud and offer bogus solutions to the problem," said Michael Slater, the deputy director of Project Vote, "And like the Tobacco Institute, they relied on deception and faulty research to advance the interests of their clients."
but, check this...
Amid the controversy, the American Center for Voting Rights shuttered its Internet site on St. Patrick’s Day, and the two nonprofits appear to have vanished.

slate has more on the sudden disappearance of the american center for voting rights and its legislative fund...
Imagine the National Rifle Association's Web site suddenly disappeared, along with all the data and reports the group had ever posted on gun issues. Imagine Planned Parenthood inexplicably closed its doors one day, without comment from its former leaders. The scenarios are unthinkable, given how established these organizations have become. But even if something did happen to the NRA or Planned Parenthood, no doubt other gun or abortion groups would quickly fill the vacuum and push the ideas they'd pushed for years.

Not so for the American Center for Voting Rights, a group that has literally just disappeared as an organization, and for which it seems no replacement group will rise up. With no notice and little comment, ACVR—the only prominent nongovernmental organization claiming that voter fraud is a major problem, a problem warranting strict rules such as voter-ID laws—simply stopped appearing at government panels and conferences. Its Web domain name has suddenly expired, its reports are all gone (except where they have been preserved by its opponents), and its general counsel, Mark "Thor" Hearne, has cleansed his résumé of affiliation with the group. Hearne won't speak to the press about ACVR's demise. No other group has taken up the "voter fraud" mantra.

mcclatchy is kicking butt in their news reporting... they're putting all the others to shame... atrios has suggested bookmarking their site or subscribing to their rss... i agree...

p.s. just for giggles and grins, this is a screen capture of the republican national lawyers association homepage...




did you happen to notice who the rnla is thanking for sponsoring their 2007 conference...?



if the name greenberg traurig doesn't ring any bells, it should...
In January 2001, lobbyist Jack Abramoff left Preston Gates & Ellis to join Greenberg Traurig. Abramoff brought a book of business then worth more than $6 million annually to Greenberg Traurig, according to his own estimates.

In 2000, before Abramoff joined the firm, Greenberg had $3.3 million in lobbying fees. After he joined in 2001, the firm took in $16.2 million in fees. By 2002, that number jumped to $17.7 million, and $25.5 million by 2003.[7] The firm became one of the top 10 of Washington lobbying firms, moving from 16th place to fourth, according to the National Journal.

it's SUCH a small world, isn't it...?

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

So, it looks like Schlozman, the scumbag, might have been lying through his teeth

which, after watching his pathetic testimony yesterday, would not surprise me one iota... in fact, at one point, while watching him on cnn pipeline, i was actually hopping around the room, shouting, "you are LYING, you are a LIAR, LIAR, LIAR..." thank goodness no one was home at the time...

from TPMmuckraker
...

Former U.S. Attorney for New Mexico David Iglesias said he finds Bradley Schlozman's testimony about Craig Donsanto unbelievable.

Schlozman told a Senate Judiciary panel yesterday that while he was the interim U.S. Attorney in Missouri he brought four criminal voter fraud prosecutions on the eve of the 2006 midterm election after getting the go-ahead from Donsanto, the director of the election crimes branch at the department.

[...]

Iglesias was in touch with Donsanto up until the summer of 2006, just before Schlozman would have received approval to bring the indictments. Iglesias said he can’t imagine a scenario where Donsanto would have changed his mind on the department’s voter fraud policy.

[...]

The Justice Department did not respond to calls requesting comment. Donsanto did not reply to an email message, though Iglesias guesses he is not allowed to speak to the press.

loyal bushies... lying is in their dna...

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, May 30, 2007

New Gonzales video by Robert Greenwald

it's a goodie...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Jason Leopold interviews David Iglesias

watch it...



(thanks to scribefire at repository...)

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, May 25, 2007

Caging and voter suppression - Greg Palast not only has the goods, he 'splains it all for ya

this is definitive background and most certainly falls into the category of "must-watch..."

Part 1



Part 2



Part 3



(thanks to democracy now via les enragés via crooks and liars and courtesy of the brad blog...)

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

Former US Attorneys don't make idle speculations about criminal charges

political partisan, incompetent hack, or solid career legal professional, a current or former u.s. attorney simply does not run his or her mouth just to hear the sounds it makes...
John McKay, who was a US attorney for Washington state, and David Iglesias, who was the attorney for New Mexico, told the Seattle Times that they think White House adviser Karl Rove and his aides were behind the firings of selected US attorneys last December.

"I think there will be a criminal case that will come out of this," McKay said. "This is going to get worse, not better."

McKay said he believes that there is a possibility of obstruction-of-justice charges being filed.

there's a ton more out there that we don't know yet, both related to the doj and damn near everything else that's been touched by the bush administration... yeah, it's going to get worse, and that's fine by me... the whole truth and nothing but the truth can't come fast enough...

(thanks to raw story...)

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, May 02, 2007

Stepping through the looking glass into Bushworld

Alice: If I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is because everything would be what it isn't. And contrary-wise; what it is it wouldn't be, and what it wouldn't be, it would. You see?

the strange and magical world of george bush...

a problem is identified...

[U.S. District Chief Judge Donald W. Molloy of Billings] wrote to [Attorney General Alberto Gonzales] on Oct. 20, 2005, that [U.S. attorney William W. Mercer] was violating federal law because he "no longer resides in Montana" and was living with his family in the Washington area.

a response is sent...
Three weeks later, on Nov. 10, Gonzales responded to Molloy that Mercer "is in compliance with the residency requirement" under federal law because he "is domiciled there, returns there on a regular basis, and will live there full-time as soon as his temporary assignment is completed."

a bogus fix is cleverly crafted to apply retroactively...
That same day, Mercer had a GOP Senate staffer insert into a bill a provision that would change the rules so that federal prosecutors could live outside their districts to serve in other jobs, according to documents and interviews.

[...]

Mercer made his request to Brett Tolman [now the U.S. attorney in Utah], who was counsel to Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), then chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

[...]

The new provision was retroactive to February 2005, several months before Mercer began working at Justice headquarters.

congress acts...
Congress passed the provision several months later as part of the USA Patriot Act reauthorization bill, retroactively benefiting Mercer and a handful of other senior Justice officials who pull double duty as U.S. attorneys and headquarters officials.

but, apparently, the provision was intended only for "loyal bushies..."
[T]he Justice Department [claims] that it fired New Mexico prosecutor David C. Iglesias in part because he was absent from the job too much.

meanwhile, life goes on as usual...
Mercer currently serves as the acting associate attorney general and has been nominated for appointment to the job permanently. He spends only about three days a month in Montana as U.S. attorney...

and they all lived happily ever after...

go on... read it to your kids... it's a great bedtime story...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, April 27, 2007

Uh-oh... The fired U.S. attorneys are going to talk to each other...

this is good...
Fired U.S. Attorney John McKay, now a visiting professor at the Seattle University School of Law, will host two fellow purged prosecutors for a forum on the U.S. attorney scandal.
Joining McKay will be David C. Iglesias, the former U.S. attorney for New Mexico, and Paul K. Charlton, the former prosecutor for Arizona. McKay, Iglesias and Charlton are three of the most controversial firings of the eight ousted prosecutors, because they were either conducting sensitive investigations of Republicans or under fire for not prosecuting Democrats around the time of their dismissals on Dec. 7.

All three were also contacted by members of Congress or their staff at a sensitive time regarding ongoing criminal corruption investigations.

getting together may help them piece together the bigger picture of what happened as some of them will be able to provide bits and pieces that the others didn't have... they ought to see how many others would be willing to join them... they should also transcribe the proceedings and send it to leahy...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Iglesias' complaint launched OSC investigation

interesting-er and interesting-er...

think progress has the goods...

Labels: , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Thursday, April 12, 2007

Tough shit, Pete, suck it up... Besides, NM's a great place to retire...

hell like you've never experienced, eh...?
The Associated Press today reports on rumors that Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM), one of two members of Congress in possible ethical trouble for allegedly contacting the U.S. Attorney in New Mexico to discuss grand jury proceedings, may retire. But the senator's staff pointed to the ample money he has raised as evidence he won't quit.

"Down the road, as the election comes — will questions about his health or the (U.S. attorney) story hurt his campaign?" asked University of New Mexico political science professor Lonna Atkeson in an interview with the AP.

At a recent banquet in Albuquerque, the New Mexico Republican apparently "called recent weeks 'hell' like he had never experienced his entire career."

Since an ethics complaint was filed against the senator in February for calling U.S. Attorney David Iglesias prior to the November 2006 elections and inquiring about the status of grand jury proceedings in a political fraud case, Democrats have seen an opportunity to defeat the longtime Republican senator, comparing him with Sen. Conrad Burns (R-MT), who was linked into the Abramoff scandal.

ya know what...? when these guys start boo-hooing, i glaze over... they've enabled the bush administration to march steadfastly down the path to a one-party, authoritarian state for 6+ years without uttering a peep to stop them... they should have thought of the consequences both for themselves and for the country they supposedly were elected to serve before they agreed to play along with criminals...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Monday, April 09, 2007

Every once in a while, Fred Hiatt tosses us a bone

big whoop, and not much of a bone either...
The Iglesias Episode

The firing of the U.S. attorney in New Mexico has not been adequately explained.

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Oh, Karl... You may not get out of this one alive...

hey... a guy can hope, can't he...?
"New Mexico Republican Sen. Pete Domenici's chief of staff sent a cryptic thank-you note to Karl Rove just as the senator was recommending replacements for David Iglesias, the fired U.S. attorney in New Mexico, according to internal White House and Justice Department documents," writes Michael Isikoff.

"Thanks for everything," read the e-mail dated January 8th, 2007 and included the name of a replacement candidate for Iglesias.

The email, which was sent to Rove and two other White House officials, may have been initially overlooked because it was sent to a more obscure of Rove's e-mail accounts.

Though it is unknown why Rove was being thanked, Iglesias is convinced that the e-mail implicates Rove.

"This absolutely corroborates what I’ve been saying all along—this is a political matter, not a performance matter," Iglesias told Newsweek after being read the e-mail. "What is he thanking him [Rove] for? It's thanking him for getting Dave out of the picture."

"a more obscure of rove's e-mail accounts..." ya gotta love it...

(thanks to raw story...)

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Sunday, March 18, 2007

Trickle, trickle, trickle

i've been sitting here, waiting for the various sunday talk shows to cough up fresh bush administration ghastliness... sure enough...
Today on Fox News Sunday, former U.S. attorney David Iglesias beat back several misleading claims by Bush administration officials, and reasserted that his firing was a “political hit,” not done for performance reasons.

He pointed out that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales agreed to write him a recommendation even after he was fired. “If [my firing] was performance based, there is no way they would have agreed to have allowed me to list them as a reference,” he said. “In fact, they agreed, telling me that the true nature was political, not performance.”

cue the iglesias smear...

Labels: , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, March 09, 2007

Subverting the independence and objectivity of federal prosecutors is just fine

this is the kind of country our wise media pundits of the totalitarian right are working their asses off to create...
Politicians should be allowed to call federal prosecutors and question them about ongoing cases, says Weekly Standard co-founder Fred Barnes.

Referring to phone calls made by Sen. Pete Domenici (R-NM) and Rep. Heather Wilson (R-NM) to US Attorney David Iglesias prior to his firing, Barnes told host Brit Hume on Fox News Special Report, "I don't think there's anything wrong with these phone calls that were made."

They called Iglesias "and asked if what was an indictment of a former Democratic official was going to happen before election day," he continues. "Well now, that seems perfectly okay to me, if they do that."

The fact that Iglesias was fired shortly after the phone calls in question is not brought up by anyone on the Fox News panel.

but, wait, it gets worse...
Fellow panelist Mara Liasson of NPR later concedes, "Ethics experts down the line say that elected officials are not supposed to inquire about ongoing cases."

"Why?" exclaims Barnes in reply. "That's nonsense! Total nonsense!"

to avoid even the whiff of partisan pressure, members of congress and those in the various agencies of the executive branch who are not officially involved in a case, should keep their bloody noses out... why would you even want to risk the APPEARANCE of coercion...?

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments