Blog Flux Directory Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines http://www.wikio.com Blog directory
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Mandy: Great blog!
Mark: Thanks to all the contributors on this blog. When I want to get information on the events that really matter, I come here.
Penny: I'm glad I found your blog (from a comment on Think Progress), it's comprehensive and very insightful.
Eric: Nice site....I enjoyed it and will be back.
nora kelly: I enjoy your site. Keep it up! I particularly like your insights on Latin America.
Alison: Loquacious as ever with a touch of elegance -- & right on target as usual!
"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it."
- Noam Chomsky
Send tips and other comments to: profmarcus2010@yahoo.com

And, yes, I DO take it personally

Thursday, November 15, 2007

Big Brother is eavesdropping

Big Brother
from Slate: "State Your Secrets":

"We agree with the administration that state secrets should be protected at all costs."

Huh? Are they nuts? At all costs? Armageddon? Total lockdown? Absolute fealty to all that is anathema, loathsome, repugnant and vile, masquerading as government?

The state secrets are otherwise known as CRIMES!

Labels: , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, November 09, 2007

Feinstein joins Rockefeller in repudiating the rule of law

to say nothing of the united states constitution...
Sen. Dianne Feinstein said Thursday that she favors legal immunity for telecommunications companies that allegedly shared millions of customers' telephone and e-mail messages and records with the government, a position that could lead to the dismissal of numerous lawsuits pending in San Francisco.

In a statement at a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is considering legislation to extend the Bush administration's electronic surveillance program, Feinstein said the companies should not be "held hostage to costly litigation in what is essentially a complaint about administration activities."

She endorsed a recent statement by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W. Va., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, that companies assured by top administration officials that the surveillance program was legal "should not be dragged through the courts for their help with national security."

Feinstein, D-Calif., plays a pivotal role on the Judiciary Committee, which has a 10-9 Democratic majority. If she joins committee Republicans in voting next Thursday to protect telecommunications companies from lawsuits for their roles in the surveillance program, the proposal - a top priority of President Bush - will become part of legislation that reaches the Senate floor.

difi really doesn't care WHO knows she's a traitor, does she...? first mukasey, and now this... i bet joe lieberman is ecstatic... it's just gonna take some of the heat off of him...

Labels: , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

Brendan Skwire phones Senator Jay Rockefeller's office

entirely too good to pass up... brendan posts over at booman tribune and at brendan calling...
Ring. Riiiiiiing.

"Hello, Senator Rockefeller's office."

"Hi there, my name's Brendan Skwire, and I need some help from the Senator.
"It seems I've broken a few laws, and I'm looking at a felony conviction.

The judge has pretty much rejected my arguments of innocence, so I was wondering how much it will cost me to get Senator Rockefeller to write an ex post facto bill giving me immunity from my crimes. I don't have as much money as AT&T, but since Senator Rockefeller's selling indulgences, I was wondering how much it'll cost me. Can you give me some idea?"

"Sir, if you'd just look at Senator Rockefeller's website, he explai--"

"Oh yeah, I've been to his website. And I've also been reading about how the Senator didn't get any donations to speak of from AT&T until 2006-2007, when it spiked by nearly $20,000, so I've been wondering how much will it cost me to buy Senator Rockefeller?"

"Sir, I'll pass your message along."

"Thanks. Hey, why's he doing this anyway? He's independently wealthy, and doesn't need the $25,000 or whatever."

"Sir--"

"And what gives him the right to sell of my Fourth Amendment rights? Those rights aren't his to sell, and they're worth a hell of a lot more than a measley $25,000. You might even say they're priceless."

"I'll pass your message along." -Click-

Jay Rockefeller deserves to burn in Hell for his shameful sell-out. The man is no better than Quisling or Petain. Tom Paine, Ben Franklin, and the rest of the Founding Fathers are spinning in their graves right now.

yes, he does deserve to burn in hell, right next to MY senator, harry reid...

Labels: , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Monday, October 22, 2007

Virtually no daylight between Democrats and Republicans

booman expresses his serious frustration with democratic inaction on phase II of the pre-war intelligence investigation... remember that...? i had quite honestly forgotten...
Remember when Harry Reid was Minority Leader and he used some procedural move to shut-down the Senate until the Republicans would agree to move forward with Phase II investigation over pre-war intelligence? How's that Phase II investigation going now that Harry Reid controls the Senate?
Still, another Intelligence panel Democrat, Dianne Feinstein of California, said the status of the Phase II investigation was a “good question.” Feinstein said she has not “been at a meeting where it’s come up. But I can’t make every meeting.”

[Intelligence Chairman Jay] Rockefeller said last week that the investigation is “chugging along very nicely,” but quietly, “without pyrotechnics,” a reference to the fights of recent years.

Not so, said Christopher S. Bond of Missouri, the top Republican on the Intelligence panel. “They haven’t scheduled any time on it,” he said.

The Phase II investigation is supposed to focus on two things: "examining the role of the Pentagon’s Office of Special Plans and...contrasting the statements of public officials with what the intelligence community was saying at the time."

The Democrats' excuse is that they are working on more pressing matters, like the FISA bill...which they passed out of committee last week with retroactive immunity for the telecommunications corporations.

The FISA bill is important, but not nearly as important as holding the criminals that got us into this catastrophic war accountable. The Dems are more concerned with covering the ass of the Establishment than they are with getting us out of this war.

i got chewed out royally last january by a woman friend of mine who does serious legwork for the dems in a rural county... i was expressing dismay that the new democratic congress wasn't picking up the ball in nearly the way i had hoped... she hit the ceiling and told me i was being unreasonable, that i needed to give them some time, that they had a strong "first 100 days" agenda and that they were getting things in place to make sure it all happened...

my expectation, which i now see to have been pure fantasy, was that a dem congress would take serious, forceful steps to remedy a downhill luge run to an authoritarian state... i was heartened when the investigations under waxman, conyers and leahy got rolling, although i still couldn't understand why, with clearly impeachable offenses just sitting out there beckoning, we weren't taking that step... then came the white house and doj stonewalling of congressional committee requests, followed by the subpoenas, followed by more stonewalling... and now...? crickets chirping...

the inaction on phase II is part and parcel of the whole pattern that's emerged, the truly horrifying part of which is that there's virtually no daylight between the dems and the r's... is the 2008 election, a democratic president and a stronger democratic presence in congress going to remedy this...? color me highly dubious...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments