Blog Flux Directory Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines http://www.wikio.com Blog directory
And, yes, I DO take it personally
Mandy: Great blog!
Mark: Thanks to all the contributors on this blog. When I want to get information on the events that really matter, I come here.
Penny: I'm glad I found your blog (from a comment on Think Progress), it's comprehensive and very insightful.
Eric: Nice site....I enjoyed it and will be back.
nora kelly: I enjoy your site. Keep it up! I particularly like your insights on Latin America.
Alison: Loquacious as ever with a touch of elegance -- & right on target as usual!
"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it."
- Noam Chomsky
Send tips and other comments to: profmarcus2010@yahoo.com

And, yes, I DO take it personally

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

George Bush...? Contempt for the law...? NO-O-O-O-OOO...! Say it isn't so...!

at 1:05, it's a bit longish, but damn well worthwhile...
Bush has a sneering contempt for the law

He says that on his say so alone he can identify anyone in the United States as creating a "significant risk of undermining reconstruction program in Iraq, or political reform by creating a risk that an act of violence might be committed." And when he identifies you, he doesn't inform you. But you are instantly subjected to a financial death penalty. All your assets are frozen; no one then can do any business with you.

A Must Watch - Video Discussion -

Chairman of the American Freedom Agenda
Bruce Fein and former United States
Congressman Bob Barr

Labels: , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, May 25, 2007

The U.S.-Mexico domestic spying story: does anybody remember Echelon? how about Porter Goss and Bob Barr?



i posted last night and earlier today on the story the la times broke yesterday about the u.s. helping to fund mexico's domestic spying effort...
Mexico is expanding its ability to tap telephone calls and e-mail using money from the U.S. government, a move that underlines how the country's conservative government is increasingly willing to cooperate with the United States on law enforcement.

the follow-up post today was due to not having read the times article as thoroughly as i should have and, on a re-read, i picked up on a couple of important points i had missed the first time...
information collected in either country can end up in any hands that either government should decide to put it in, whether it's inside or outside the country, governmental or private sector...

two, this is yet another way to bypass fisa and the 4th amendment and gain access to the the enormous volume of communications traffic between the united states and mexico...

but, still, the story has been nagging at me all day, and i suddenly remembered why... does anybody remember echelon (pdf)...? i've followed echelon off and on for some years and, given the current u.s. domestic spying issue, and now, with the u.s. helping fund mexico's newly-elected conservative president, felipe calderón, to get on the domestic spying bandwagon, it may be time to pay another visit to one of the scarier programs i've heard about...

i've posted several times on echelon in the past (here, here, and here)... here's a sampling...

first this from echelon watch, a site created by the aclu but no longer maintained...

Echelon is perhaps the most powerful intelligence gathering organization in the world. Several credible reports suggest that this global electronic communications surveillance system presents an extreme threat to the privacy of people all over the world. According to these reports, ECHELON attempts to capture staggering volumes of satellite, microwave, cellular and fiber-optic traffic, including communications to and from North America. This vast quantity of voice and data communications are then processed through sophisticated filtering technologies.

This massive surveillance system apparently operates with little oversight. Moreover, the agencies that purportedly run ECHELON have provided few details as to the legal guidelines for the project. Because of this, there is no way of knowing if ECHELON is being used illegally to spy on private citizens.



Menwith Hill, UK

then this from the aclu, may 2001...
Previous inquiries by the European Parliament have resulted in reports detailing the existence of a surveillance system known as ECHELON, which is led by the NSA in conjunction with its counterpart agencies in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. According to the reports, ECHELON has communications receiving stations all over the world and attempts to capture all satellite, microwave, cellular and fiber-optic communications worldwide, including communications to and from North America. Computers then sort through conversations, faxes and emails searching for keywords and other triggers. Communications that include triggers chosen by the intelligence agencies are transcribed and forwarded for further investigation.

[...]

"It appears that the NSA is engaged in a surveillance system of epic proportions," Steinhardt said. "If these reports are true, ECHELON dwarfs the extensive surveillance of Americans already conducted by the FBI and other domestic law enforcement agencies."

and look who pops up back in 1999...
Following recent revelations in Australia and Canada on the international signals intelligence network known as ECHELON, Reps. Porter Goss and Bob Barr have requested access to National Security Agency files concerning the legality of the surveillance system. On May 13, Barr succeeded in attaching a requirement to the Intelligence Authorization Act that would require the National Security Agency, the CIA and the Justice Department to prepare a report on ECHELON for the Congress within 60 days of its enactment. The report would describe the legal standards employed by elements of the Intelligence Community in conducting signals intelligence activities, including electronic surveillance. This would include systems like ECHELON that eavesdrop on international telecommunications. As Barr explained, Congress
is concerned about the privacy rights for American citizens and whether or not there are constitutional safeguards being circumvented by the manner in which the intelligence agencies are intercepting and/or receiving international communications back from foreign nations that would otherwise be prohibited by the prohibitions and the limitations on the collection of domestic intelligence.

anyway, my point is this... IF echelon has been in existence for quite some time (and it appears as though it has), AND the uk, canada, australia, new zealand, and the u.s. are all in bed together, AND the 4th amendment does not prevent information gathered outside the country from being used inside the u.s., AND these five countries are all trading information, that confirms my suspicion that virtually every electronic transaction that any of us make on any network outside of our own personal control, is available for sniffing AND recording - if pattern analysis warrants kicking out a specific transaction to be further analyzed - and that this has been going on at least since the mid-90s...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

"Who’s the toughest hombre"

it's the game george loves best... if he has a chance to demonstrate his swagger, he'll take it every time... it certainly doesn't help that he has so many enablers surrounding him...
Rep. Bob Barr (R-GA), who served as a U.S. Attorney under President Reagan, appeared today on CNN.

Barr blasted the White House, saying “the integrity of the Department of Justice is being used as a political football by the administration to prove who’s the toughest hombre in all this.” Rather than fighting accountability, Barr said, “the administration really ought to be going out of its way to do what prior administrations have done, such as the Bush 1 administration and Reagan administrations, and that is take whatever steps are necessary to assure the American people that the integrity of our justice system has not been compromised.”

Barr added that members of Congress “have a pretty clear right to demand information” related to the U.S. Attorney purge. “These, after all, are all people, whether Karl Rove or a U.S. Attorney or an attorney general, who are paid by the taxpayers with funds appropriated by the Congress. And Congress has a right to assure itself that these funds are being used properly.”

george's support is melting like ice shelves in the arctic... too bad it doesn't make any difference... he's going to go to the mat on this just like they said they would before the november elections...
[T]hey're going to fight it all the way to the Supreme Court on every issue, every time, no compromise, no discussion, no negotiation.

i'm ready... i just hope congressional resolve doesn't start melting in the heat...

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments

Friday, February 23, 2007

The "main components of a police state"

i posted last week on joe conason's new book, It Can Happen Here: Authoritarian Peril in the Age of Bush... here's another excerpt, this one from alternet, that highlights leading republicans who see strong reason to be more than a little bit concerned with the megalomaniacal tendencies of the bush administration...
Former Republican congressman Bob Barr of Georgia, who served as one of the managers of the impeachment of Bill Clinton in the House of Representatives, has joined the American Civil Liberties Union he once detested. In the measures taken by the Bush administration and approved by his former colleagues, Barr sees the potential for "a totalitarian type regime."

Paul Craig Roberts, a longtime contributor to the Wall Street Journal and a former Treasury official under Reagan, perceives the "main components of a police state" in the Bush administration's declaration of plenary powers to deny fundamental rights to suspected terrorists. Bruce Fein, who served as associate attorney general in the Reagan Justice Department, believes that the Bush White House is "a clear and present danger to the rule of law," and that the president "cannot be trusted to conduct the war against global terrorism with a decent respect for civil liberties and checks against executive abuses." Syndicated columnist George Will accuses the administration of pursuing a "monarchical doctrine" in its assertion of extraordinary war powers.

yep, i'm bangin' the drum - again... george has to go... they ALL have to go...

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller



[Permalink] 0 comments