Would adoption of a withdrawal timetable produce a de facto cease-fire?
a very good question...
robert parry writes in consortium news...
there's a compelling logic to what parry suggests... in any case, how can things get much worse...?
given bush's history of spoiled child tantrums and insistence on getting his own way, and in the unlikely event we experience a deus ex machina, bush will exercise the second veto of his presidency and our troops and the iraqis will pay the price...
Tweet
robert parry writes in consortium news...
George W. Bush admits he has no evidence that a withdrawal timetable from Iraq would be harmful. Instead, the President told interviewer Charlie Rose that this core assumption behind his veto threat of a Democratic war appropriation bill is backed by “just logic.”
“I mean, you say we start moving troops out,” Bush said in the interview on April 24. “Don’t you think an enemy is going to wait and adjust based upon an announced timetable for withdrawal?”
It is an argument that Bush has made again and again over the past few years, that with a withdrawal timetable, the “enemy” would just “wait us out.” But the answer to Bush’s rhetorical question could be, “well, so what if they do?”
If Bush is right and a withdrawal timetable quiets Iraq down for the next year or so – a kind of de facto cease-fire – that could buy time for the Iraqis to begin the difficult process of reconciliation and start removing the irritants that have enflamed the violence.
there's a compelling logic to what parry suggests... in any case, how can things get much worse...?
Obviously, there is no guarantee that a timetable for a U.S. withdrawal would bring peace to Iraq. The greater likelihood remains that civil strife will continue for some years to come as Iraq’s factions nurse their grievances and push for a new national equilibrium.
But the counterpoint to Bush’s veto threat against a withdrawal timetable is that his open-ended war is doomed to failure. To attain even the appearance of limited success would require American forces to effectively exterminate all Iraqis who are part of the armed resistance to the U.S. occupation.
After all, the only logical reason for not wanting the “enemy” to lie low is so American troops can capture or kill them.
given bush's history of spoiled child tantrums and insistence on getting his own way, and in the unlikely event we experience a deus ex machina, bush will exercise the second veto of his presidency and our troops and the iraqis will pay the price...
Labels: Bush Administration, George Bush, Iraq, Iraq civil war, Iraq death toll, Iraq Escalation, Iraq insurgents, Iraq war funding proposal, Iraq withdrawal
Submit To PropellerTweet