"Almost no terrorists exist in the United States"
(from foreign affairs via lukery at wot is it good 4 via scott...)
simple logic... simple reason... why, for god's sake, is it so difficult to come by these days...?
< d'oh > Submit To Propeller
Tweet
simple logic... simple reason... why, for god's sake, is it so difficult to come by these days...?
[I]f it is so easy to pull off an attack and if terrorists are so demonically competent, why have they not done it? Why have they not been sniping at people in shopping centers, collapsing tunnels, poisoning the food supply, cutting electrical lines, derailing trains, blowing up oil pipelines, causing massive traffic jams, or exploiting the countless other vulnerabilities that, according to security experts, could so easily be exploited?
One reasonable explanation is that almost no terrorists exist in the United States and few have the means or the inclination to strike from abroad. But this explanation is rarely offered.
Instead, Americans are told -- often by the same people who had once predicted imminent attacks -- that the absence of international terrorist strikes in the United States is owed to the protective measures so hastily and expensively put in place after 9/11. But there is a problem with this argument. True, there have been no terrorist incidents in the United States in the last five years. But nor were there any in the five years before the 9/11 attacks, at a time when the United States was doing much less to protect itself.
< d'oh > Submit To Propeller
Tweet