cheap shot artists in government
(h/t) DU for pointing us to "Naomi Wolf / Viet Dinh interview, Part 2"
And just when you think things cannot get any more over-the-top Draconian, with religion masquerading as law, now Pravda reports this: "US House of Representatives to fight against sex predators in Internet".
Do the American people, or heck, the people-of-the-world, (since they're all pretty much herded too by this country's machinations and coercion), have any idea how gullible they are to this kind of manipulation?
I predicted there would be a slew of giga-crap coming out of this government about the time they ram through the Telcom Immunity Bill. So now it seems quite clear that their warrantless domestic spying has been carried out on this pretext all along, at "policing pornography". Now we understand a great deal better, at least some of the nature of their as-of-yet undisclosed breadth and extent of their illegal spying.
This legislation is long the product of lies, worse now that ever before. Government has long since put the commercial studios producing actual child sex videos, out of business. Yet they claim it is now a $30 billion industry. It is nothing near the sort. They then put the nude model sites out of business. Now they are claiming it is the ultimate felony to appreciate child bathing suit and underwear models. These lawmakers are SICK, SICK, SICK. There now remain but a very limited number of baithing suit and underwear models sites at this point in time.
The government no longer even posts decoy sites with nudes, as they claim clothed-sites qualify as pornography, so putting up nude decoy sites seems to them no longer necessary.
Tweet
And just when you think things cannot get any more over-the-top Draconian, with religion masquerading as law, now Pravda reports this: "US House of Representatives to fight against sex predators in Internet".
The U.S. House of Representatives will track down people who use the Internet to prey on children, working through bills that would make it easier to monitor and prosecute cyber crimes against juveniles and to educate children about online dangers.
'We need to think of this as a war', said Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, a Democrat, sponsor of one of a half-dozen sex predator, child pornography and Internet safety bills heading for passage Wednesday. The bills were put together by the Democratic majority but enjoyed wide bipartisan support.
Her bill would approve spending $1 billion (680 million EUR) over the next eight years to combat online child exploitation. It would create a Justice Department office to coordinate prosecution efforts; increases money for a program that helps state and local law enforcement; and provides more dollars to hire agents and improve forensic lab capabilities dedicated to child exploitation cases. It passed 415-2.
She said law enforcement has identified nearly 500,000 individuals trafficking in child pornography over the Internet, but because of a lack of resources, only about 2 percent are under investigation.
The other bills would:
-Approve $5 million (3.4 million EUR) a year for five years for an initiative that conducts Internet safety programs for children. An additional $5 million a year would go for competitive grants for similar initiatives. The bill passed by voice vote.
-Respond to a court decision last year to throw out a child pornography conviction on the grounds that the material moved on the Internet did not constitute interstate commerce. It would specify that Internet transmissions do fulfill the commerce clause. A vote on the bill sponsored was pending.
-Enhance federal agent and probation officer efforts to monitor the computer use of convicted sex offenders. It would authorize courts to require, as a condition of probation, that convicted sex offenders cooperate in installing Internet filtering and monitoring systems. The bill also would increase prison terms for those who lie about their age in order to engage in criminal sexual conduct with a minor. It passed 417-0.
-Make it easier to prosecute federal child pornography law. The proposal would clarify that knowingly accessing child pornography on the Internet constitutes possession even if the person does not download or save the content. It also would subject those who profit from child pornography to money laundering charges. A vote on the bill was pending.
-Require the Federal Trade Commission to increase public awareness and education about Internet safety. The proposal, passed 398-6."
Do the American people, or heck, the people-of-the-world, (since they're all pretty much herded too by this country's machinations and coercion), have any idea how gullible they are to this kind of manipulation?
I predicted there would be a slew of giga-crap coming out of this government about the time they ram through the Telcom Immunity Bill. So now it seems quite clear that their warrantless domestic spying has been carried out on this pretext all along, at "policing pornography". Now we understand a great deal better, at least some of the nature of their as-of-yet undisclosed breadth and extent of their illegal spying.
This legislation is long the product of lies, worse now that ever before. Government has long since put the commercial studios producing actual child sex videos, out of business. Yet they claim it is now a $30 billion industry. It is nothing near the sort. They then put the nude model sites out of business. Now they are claiming it is the ultimate felony to appreciate child bathing suit and underwear models. These lawmakers are SICK, SICK, SICK. There now remain but a very limited number of baithing suit and underwear models sites at this point in time.
The government no longer even posts decoy sites with nudes, as they claim clothed-sites qualify as pornography, so putting up nude decoy sites seems to them no longer necessary.
Labels: Conspiracy theories, Naoimi Wolf, Patriot Act, surveillance, Viet Dinh
Submit To PropellerTweet
posted by mettle at
11/14/2007
