Blog Flux Directory Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines http://www.wikio.com Blog directory
And, yes, I DO take it personally: hidden hands and machinations
Mandy: Great blog!
Mark: Thanks to all the contributors on this blog. When I want to get information on the events that really matter, I come here.
Penny: I'm glad I found your blog (from a comment on Think Progress), it's comprehensive and very insightful.
Eric: Nice site....I enjoyed it and will be back.
nora kelly: I enjoy your site. Keep it up! I particularly like your insights on Latin America.
Alison: Loquacious as ever with a touch of elegance -- & right on target as usual!
"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it."
- Noam Chomsky
Send tips and other comments to: profmarcus2010@yahoo.com /* ---- overrides for post page ---- */ .post { padding: 0; border: none; }

Wednesday, November 14, 2007

hidden hands and machinations

Here is an interview of Naomi Wolf by Viet Dinh, who is responsible for writing much of the cursed P.A.T.R.I.O.T Act.



The following description can be found posted liberally around the Web, and it builds upon some of the understanding of what we learned from Alex Jones' video posted here previously, that mentioned the House of Rothschild:

Adam Weishaupt, a young professor of canon law at Ingolstadt University in Germany, was a Jesuit priest and an initiate of the Illuminati. Researchers agree that he was financed by the House of Rothschild (mentioned in 'Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars'). Weishaupt advocated 'abolition of all ordered national governments, abolition of inheritance, abolition of private property, abolition of patriotism, abolition of the individual home and family life as the cell from which all civilizations have stemmed, and abolition of all religions established and existing so that the ideology of totalitarianism may be imposed on mankind.' In the same year that he founded the Illuminati he published Wealth of Nations, the book that provided the ideological foundation for capitalism and for the Industrial Revolution. It is no accident that the Declaration of Independence was written in the same year. Every tenet was the same.

Date and beliefs confirm that Weishaupt's Illuminati is the same as the Afghan Illuminated Ones and the other cults which called themselves 'illuminated.' The Alumbrados of Spain were the same as were the 'illuminated' Guerinets of France. In the United States they were known as the Jacobin clubs. Secrets within secrets within secrets--but always at the heart is the Brotherhood. Weishaupt was betrayed and set up for persecution because he ignored the rule that the word 'illuminati' or the existence of the Brotherhood would never be exposed to public knowledge. His exposure and outlawing accomplished several goals of the still - hidden and still very powerful brotherhood. It allowed members to debunk claims of its existence on the grounds that the Illuminati had been exposed and outlawed and thus was no longer a reality. It allowed members to deny allegations of conspiracy of any kind. Weishaupt may have been a fool--or he may have been doing exactly what he was told. Weishaupt said, 'The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment; let it never appear in its own name, but always covered by another name, and another occupation.'"

Found at the forbidden knowledge:

[T]here is a power so organized, so subtle, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." -- President Woodrow Wilson

[...]

The "real" Illuminati is the name of an organization founded in Bavaria in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt. Weishaupt formed a secret society within another secret society, Freemasonry. Some believe that Weishaupt created the Illuminati with the express purpose of overthrowing governments and bringing about a new social order. Others, as you will read, disagree. Many opinions exist as to the origins, motives, and the ultimate fate of the Illuminati.

[...]

Some (e.g. M. William Cooper) believe that the Illuminati were purposely allowed to flourish within the Lodges of Freemasonry, so that they could eventually claim that the had been invaded unknowingly, but the awful conspiracy had been squelched. This, according to Cooper, is a cover to deflect accusations, and to hide the fact that it merely went underground to resurface later under myriad different names.

[...]

'The great strength of our Order lies in its concealment; let it never appear in any place in its own name, but always concealed by another name, and another occupation. None is fitter than the lower degrees of Freemasonry; the public is accustomed to it, expects little from it, and therefore takes little notice of it. Next to this, the form of a learned or literary society is best suited to our purpose, and had Freemasonry not existed, this cover would have been employed; and it may be much more than a cover, it may be a powerful engine in our hands... A Literary Society is the most proper form for the introduction of our Order into any state where we are yet strangers.'

-- John Robinson, quoting Adam Weishaupt, in "Proofs of a Conspiracy" 1798, re-printed by Western Islands, Boston, 1967, p. 112

So does it really matter whether they are concealed as Freemasons, Skull and Bones, or Bilderbergs, at any given particular point in time?

Following the destruction of a regional 50-year-old nudist colony to a government-sanctioned pogrom, I became quite attuned to those religious crusades, all about.

So when I learned, in 2001, that the Freemasons were hosting a multi-national conference to eliminate child pornography and to raise the age-of-consent, uniformly, among the states and the countries of the world, I made it a point to attend. The conference was attended by government officials and members of academia alike, who thereupon, declared a crusade. They cunningly manufactured quite a scare.

Here is from an article posted in the Register that same year:


America fully brainwashed by cybercrime FUD
By: Thomas C Greene in Washington
Posted: 03/04/2001 at 22:15 GMT

Child-protective hysterics who want to eavesdrop on the electronic comings and goings of ordinary citizens in the name of legions of exploited little lambs have successfully won the hearts and washed the brains of nearly all Americans.

The US populace is 'deeply worried' about Internet crime; and on-line kiddie porn looms as the greatest terror in the collective imagination. Fully ninety-two per cent of Americans -- far more than have ever so much as touched a personal computer -- claim to be outraged by Internet KP, and half characterize it as 'the single most heinous crime that takes place on line', according to a new survey by the Pew Charitable Trust Internet Project.

[...]

Second on the menu of imagined horrors terrifying Americans is credit card theft. Eighty-seven per cent are 'concerned' and sixty-nine per cent are 'very concerned', in spite of the glaring fact that only a tiny handful have actually had their account numbers stolen and misused due to Internet shopping.

'Only eight per cent of those who say their credit card was swiped reported that the thief might have gotten the information because the consumer had provided it on line', the survey notes.

As with the kiddie porn horror, women are slightly more frightened of on-line fraudsters than men by a margin of seventy-two to sixty-five per cent.

Next comes the widespread anxiety of Internet terrorism, with eighty-two per cent of Americans claiming to be 'concerned' about organized efforts to bring all of civilization to its knees with viruses and packet floods. As one might expect, those who have never used the Internet are considerably more eager to believe in it.

Fear of contracting viruses and Trojans, and being victimized by malicious hackers, rounds out the list of persistent fears keeping America awake all night.

So it was at this point quite clear, that the campaign of the morals crusaders was to provoke a total surveillance of the Internet, on concocted fear-mongering.

In June 2001, the then Surgeon General, David Satcher, M.D., Ph.D., included the following paragraph in his report on our need for each reclaiming our sexuality, and thus mitigated some of the moral crusader's, laboriously concocted, tempest-in-a-teapot:

[T]his Surgeon General's Call to Action is offered as a framework.

It is, however, only a first step-a call to begin a mature and thoughtful discussion about sexuality. We must understand that sexuality encompasses more than sexual behavior, that the many aspects of sexuality include not only the physical, but the mental and spiritual as well, and that sexuality is a core component of personality. Sexuality is a fundamental part of human life. While the problems usually associated with sexual behavior are real and need to be addressed, human sexuality also has significant meaning and value in each individual's life. This call, and the discussion it is meant to generate, is not just intended for health care professionals or policy makers. It is intended for parents, teachers, clergy, social service professionals - all of us."

When 911 came along, these shadowy powers simply substituted that pretext, instead.

Labels: , , , , ,

Submit To Propeller


And, yes, I DO take it personally home page