A headline that says it all
from today's wapo roundup of the nation's op-ed pages...
and just in case you had any doubt about what they might mean by that, here's the paragraph that 'splains it all...
it's hard to believe that these major media outlets are, once again, playing willing pawns to bushco fear-mongering... just look at the verbiage...
well, hey...! while we're at it, let's not stop with pakistan... we've got all that military firepower just sitting around in the gulf, let's go for a two-fer and bomb iran at the same time...
and these...
after all that's been revealed, discussed and written about, to still adopt these fear-mongering positions when it's patently clear that the "war on terror" has been the biggest manipulation of average citizens in modern history, is totally baffling to me... the only thing i can possibly imagine is that we're being set up for another terrorist attack so that these fine people can then say, "well, we told you so..."
Tweet
Today's Hot Topic: Rebooting the War on Terror
and just in case you had any doubt about what they might mean by that, here's the paragraph that 'splains it all...
War on Terror: After the release of the new National Intelligence Estimate on terror threats this week, the WaPo argues that the most urgent decision to be made is what to do about al-Qaeda's sanctuary in Pakistan. "If Pakistani forces cannot -- or will not -- eliminate the sanctuary, President Bush must order targeted strikes or covert actions by American forces, as he has done several times in recent years," the editors write ... the LAT argues that the report should reinvigorate Americans' interest in the war on terror. "The passage of time without another terrorist outrage on American soil has inspired complacency about continuing dangers and a reluctance to address issues -- such as the proper balance between liberty and security in an age of terror -- that are certain to recur," the editors write ... the WSJ argues that the report is "a stark reminder that al Qaeda and other radical Islamist groups continue to pose an urgent threat to our security, and that 9/11 was not the terrorist one-off that some liberals wish it were so they can switch the subject to global warming and after-school programs."
it's hard to believe that these major media outlets are, once again, playing willing pawns to bushco fear-mongering... just look at the verbiage...
must order targeted strikes or covert actions
well, hey...! while we're at it, let's not stop with pakistan... we've got all that military firepower just sitting around in the gulf, let's go for a two-fer and bomb iran at the same time...
and these...
and what would fear-mongering be without a wsj dig at the al qaeda-loving, dirty fucking hippie liberals...
- reinvigorate Americans' interest in the war on terror
- terrorist outrage on American soil
- continuing dangers ... that are certain to recur
- stark reminder
- continue to pose an urgent threat
- 9/11 not the terrorist one-off"
so they can switch the subject to global warming and after-school programs
after all that's been revealed, discussed and written about, to still adopt these fear-mongering positions when it's patently clear that the "war on terror" has been the biggest manipulation of average citizens in modern history, is totally baffling to me... the only thing i can possibly imagine is that we're being set up for another terrorist attack so that these fine people can then say, "well, we told you so..."
Labels: 9/11, Al Qaeda, fear-mongering, Iran, Islamic militants, LA Times, National Intelligence Estimate, Pakistan, Wall Street Journal, war on terror, Washington Post
Submit To PropellerTweet