"The Constitution cannot enforce itself" and George Bush as “the foetus of monarchy”
thanks to the liberal doomsayer who pointed me to this fine piece by adam cohen in today's nyt...
we've just got to keep the drumbeat for getting rid of these people going strong... i first started banging my drum during hurricane katrina, not that i was exactly a bush supporter prior to that, but, for me, that was the last straw... for the umpteenth million time, our republic is in serious danger, and it is up to us to see that it changes course...
Tweet
Given how intent the president is on expanding his authority, it is startling to recall how the Constitution’s framers viewed presidential power. They were revolutionaries who detested kings, and their great concern when they established the United States was that they not accidentally create a kingdom. To guard against it, they sharply limited presidential authority, which Edmund Randolph, a Constitutional Convention delegate and the first attorney general, called “the foetus of monarchy.”
[...]
When they drafted the Constitution, Madison and his colleagues wrote their skepticism into the text. In Britain, the king had the authority to declare war, and raise and support armies, among other war powers. The framers expressly rejected this model and gave these powers not to the president, but to Congress.
The Constitution does make the president “commander in chief,” a title President Bush often invokes. But it does not have the sweeping meaning he suggests. The framers took it from the British military, which used it to denote the highest-ranking official in a theater of battle. Alexander Hamilton emphasized in Federalist No. 69 that the president would be “nothing more” than “first general and admiral,” responsible for “command and direction” of military forces.
The founders would have been astonished by President Bush’s assertion that Congress should simply write him blank checks for war. They gave Congress the power of the purse so it would have leverage to force the president to execute their laws properly.
[...]
The Constitution cannot enforce itself.
[...]
Members of Congress should not be intimidated into thinking that they are overstepping their constitutional bounds. If the founders were looking on now, it is not Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi who would strike them as out of line, but George W. Bush, who would seem less like a president than a king.
we've just got to keep the drumbeat for getting rid of these people going strong... i first started banging my drum during hurricane katrina, not that i was exactly a bush supporter prior to that, but, for me, that was the last straw... for the umpteenth million time, our republic is in serious danger, and it is up to us to see that it changes course...
Labels: Commander in Chief, constitutional crisis, Constitutional Democracy, George Bush, Harry Reid, James Madison, Nancy Pelosi, The Founders, U.S. Constitution
Submit To PropellerTweet