Edwards, Pandagon, Shakespeare's Sister, campaigns, and bloggers
i find this to be a very insightful analysis...
what i crave from a candidate is an authentic voice, a voice "without the veils of spin and pr and plastic discretion..." reading this, i was reminded of why i was sucked back into actually caring about a political candidate when i first heard howard dean... authenticity is what is missing... i can't define it precisely, but i know it when i hear it...
Tweet
The fight was not so much about religion or online obscenity as power. The netroots are the most aggressive, ascendant force in progressive politics, wielding more members, money and media impact than most liberal organizations. In the 2006 election cycle, MoveOn alone spent more than every other liberal political action committee except the prochoice EMILY's List. According to the Institute for Politics, Democracy and the Internet, online donors gave Kerry $82 million in 2004, and Democrats expect much more in 2008. (Bush pulled only $14 million from the web.) And now top bloggers--like Jerome Armstrong, Markos Moulitsas and Glenn Greenwald--have hundreds of thousands of readers, successful books and a bully pulpit in print and broadcast media.
Republicans cannot stop the donations or pressure the media into ignoring liberal bloggers. Instead, the GOP has tried to drive a wedge between Democratic leaders and the netroots by attacking bloggers--and their readers--as an extreme vitriolic embarrassment. During the midterms, the Republican National Committee repeatedly attacked Democratic candidates for accepting netroots donations and working with bloggers, even distributing a six-page "research" brief maligning Moulitsas, the founder of Daily Kos.
[...]
"On our blogs, we all say things that might offend someone. Truth is, in life--in bars, in restaurants, in offices, on the phone--we all do that, only now there is...a permanent record," wrote Jeff Jarvis, director of CUNY's interactive journalism program, about the Edwards affair. When campaigns hire bloggers, he explained, they empower people who talk "without the veils of spin and PR and plastic discretion that politicians must learn." Yet the very skills that make a good blogger--provoking people with passionate, authentic opinions--are considered a handicap on the campaign trail.
[...]
In the end, campaigns prefer discipline over authenticity, and many bloggers do not. So Democrats should focus on tapping bloggers' energy while managing their passion--and disregard the self-serving complaints of their opponents.
what i crave from a candidate is an authentic voice, a voice "without the veils of spin and pr and plastic discretion..." reading this, i was reminded of why i was sucked back into actually caring about a political candidate when i first heard howard dean... authenticity is what is missing... i can't define it precisely, but i know it when i hear it...
Labels: 2008 Election, Blogs, Democrats, internet, John Edwards, Pandagon, Shakespeare's Sister
Submit To PropellerTweet