Daniel Ellsberg GETS IT, BIG-TIME!
this is an absolutely extraordinary speech... extraordinary not because it comes as any surprise to me, but extraordinary because daniel ellsberg actually GETS IT...
i've been screaming my fool head off on exactly these points for what seems like FOREVER... what ellsberg is saying is so damn critical for our very SURVIVAL as a constitutionally-based, democratic republic, his points simply CANNOT be over-emphasized... god help us all, but we've GOT to do this... every single goddam day that passes that we don't is another step closer to potential disaster and ellsberg makes that point with total clarity...
please, please, can we see some courage...? PLEASE...??
(many thanks to robert parry at consortium news for making this important speech more widely available...)
Tweet
Editor’s Note: Daniel Ellsberg, the former Defense Department analyst who leaked the secret Pentagon Papers history of the Vietnam War, offered insights into the looming war with Iran and the loss of liberty in the United States at an American University symposium on Sept. 20.
[The following are excerpts from an] edited transcript of Ellsberg’s remarkable speech:
I think nothing has higher priority than averting an attack on Iran, which I think will be accompanied by a further change in our way of governing here that in effect will convert us into what I would call a police state.
If there’s another 9/11 under this regime … it means that they switch on full extent all the apparatus of a police state that has been patiently constructed, largely secretly at first but eventually leaked out and known and accepted by the Democratic people in Congress, by the Republicans and so forth.
Will there be anything left for NSA to increase its surveillance of us? … They may be to the limit of their technical capability now, or they may not. But if they’re not now they will be after another 9/11.
And I would say after the Iranian retaliation to an American attack on Iran, you will then see an increased attack on Iran – an escalation – which will be also accompanied by a total suppression of dissent in this country, including detention camps.
It’s a little hard for me to distinguish the two contingencies; they could come together. Another 9/11 or an Iranian attack in which Iran’s reaction against Israel, against our shipping, against our troops in Iraq above all, possibly in this country, will justify the full panoply of measures that have been prepared now, legitimized, and to some extent written into law. …
This is an unusual gang, even for Republicans. [But] I think that the successors to this regime are not likely to roll back the assault on the Constitution. They will take advantage of it, they will exploit it.
Will Hillary Clinton as president decide to turn off NSA after the last five years of illegal surveillance? Will she deprive her administration her ability to protect United States citizens from possible terrorism by blinding herself and deafening herself to all that NSA can provide? I don’t think so.
Unless this somehow, by a change in our political climate, of a radical change, unless this gets rolled back in the next year or two before a new administration comes in – and there’s no move to do this at this point – unless that happens I don’t see it happening under the next administration, whether Republican or Democratic.
[...]
Let me simplify this and not just to be rhetorical: A coup has occurred. I woke up the other day realizing, coming out of sleep, that a coup has occurred. It’s not just a question that a coup lies ahead with the next 9/11. That’s the next coup, that completes the first.
[...]
We are heading towards an insane operation. It is not certain. It is likely. … I want to try to be realistic myself here, to encourage us to do what we must do, what is needed to be done with the full recognition of the reality. Nothing is impossible.
What I’m talking about in the way of a police state, in the way of an attack on Iran is not certain. Nothing is certain, actually. However, I think it is probable, more likely than not, that in the next 15, 16 months of this administration we will see an attack on Iran. Probably. Whatever we do.
And … we will not succeed in moving Congress probably, and Congress probably will not stop the president from doing this. And that’s where we’re heading. That’s a very ugly, ugly prospect.
However, I think it’s up to us to work to increase that small perhaps – anyway not large – possibility and probability to avert this within the next 15 months, aside from the effort that we have to make for the rest of our lives.
i've been screaming my fool head off on exactly these points for what seems like FOREVER... what ellsberg is saying is so damn critical for our very SURVIVAL as a constitutionally-based, democratic republic, his points simply CANNOT be over-emphasized... god help us all, but we've GOT to do this... every single goddam day that passes that we don't is another step closer to potential disaster and ellsberg makes that point with total clarity...
Getting out of Iraq will take a long time. Averting Iran and averting a further coup in the face of a 9/11, another attack, is for right now, it can’t be put off. It will take a kind of political and moral courage of which we have seen very little…
please, please, can we see some courage...? PLEASE...??
(many thanks to robert parry at consortium news for making this important speech more widely available...)
Labels: 9/11, Congress, coup d'etat, Daniel Ellsberg, Democrats, Habeas Corpus, Hillary Clinton, Iran, Iran war planning, Iraq, Republicans, Robert Parry, U.S. Constitution, White House coup
Submit To PropellerTweet