Will the crisis between the UK and Iran lead to airstrikes on Iran?
the Steering Group of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) has some thoughts on the crisis between Iran and the United Kingdom over the seizure of 15 British naval personnel for allegedly crossing into Iranian territorial waters...
the most troublesome part of their article, to me at least, is this...
fortunately, saudi arabia has taken a stance on iraq that seems to have surprised bushco and does not bode well for any support bushco might have thought the saudis would give to a strike on iran... my impression is that bush, cheney & co. would prefer NOT to piss off an apparently already pissed-off saudi arabia...
Tweet
What is known at this point regarding the circumstances suggests Royal Navy misfeasance rather than deliberate provocation. The way the UK and US media has been stoked, however, suggests that both London and Washington may decide to represent the intransigence of Iranian hotheads as a casus belli for the long prepared air strikes on Iran.
[...]
Unless one’s basic intention is to provoke a hostile action to which the US and UK could “retaliate,” getting involved in a tit-for-tat contest with the Iranians is a foolish and reckless game, for it may not prove possible to avoid escalation and loss of control. And we seem to be well on our way there. If one calls Iran "evil,” arrests its diplomats, accuses it of promoting terrorism and unlawful capture, one can be certain that the Iranians will retaliate and raise the stakes in the process.
That is how the game of tit-for-tat is played in that part of the world. What British and American officials seem not to be taking into account is that the Iranians are the neighborhood toughs. In that neighborhood, they control the conditions under which the game will be played. They can change the rules freely any time they want; the UK cannot, and neither can Washington.
Provocative behavior, then, can be very dangerous, unless you mean to pick a fight you may well regret.
the most troublesome part of their article, to me at least, is this...
Bush and Cheney no doubt find encouragement in the fact that the Democrats last week refused to include in the current House bill on Iraq war funding proposed language forbidding the White House from launching war on Iran without explicit congressional approval.
If the Senate omits similar language, or if the prohibition disappears in conference, chances increase for a “pre-emptive” US and/or Israeli strike on Iran and a major war that will make the one in Iraq seem like a minor skirmish.
fortunately, saudi arabia has taken a stance on iraq that seems to have surprised bushco and does not bode well for any support bushco might have thought the saudis would give to a strike on iran... my impression is that bush, cheney & co. would prefer NOT to piss off an apparently already pissed-off saudi arabia...
Labels: Britain, Bush Administration, Dick Cheney, George Bush, Iran, Iran war planning, Iraq, media, Saudi Arabia, United Kingdom, US Senate, White House
Submit To PropellerTweet