The 9/11 "confession"
when your method of extracting information is torture, when the suspect has been kept in secret cia black site prisons since march 2003, and when the credibility of the administration responsible for perpetrating these criminal practices is less than zero, we now have a "confession" from the 9/11 "mastermind" that was, of course, issued with no independent means of ascertaining the condition or even the actual presence of the man himself...
why do i suspect that the man himself might not have been present...? read this...
and this...
what kind of justice is being served when the accused are not present at their own hearings...?
Tweet
...delivered Saturday to a closed-door military tribunal...
why do i suspect that the man himself might not have been present...? read this...
Mohammed presented evidence, in the form of a written statement, in which he appears to allege abuse.
and this...
The other hearings were for Abu Faraj al-Libi, who did not appear at his hearing, and Ramzi Binalshibh, who allegedly played a direct role in the Sept. 11 attacks. He also did not participate in the hearing.
what kind of justice is being served when the accused are not present at their own hearings...?
Labels: 9/11, black sites, Bush Administration, CIA, detainee rights, Guantánamo, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, military tribunals, secret detention
Submit To PropellerTweet
posted by profmarcus at
3/15/2007
