ING's banking group's economist issues report: "Attacking Iran"
in support of all the speculation that israel will serve as a proxy in an attack on iran's nuclear facilities...
so, why now...?
if my fairy godmother were to suddenly appear and grant me one wish, it would be for bush and cheney to resign - tomorrow... better yet, how about right now...? Submit To Propeller
Tweet
The banking division of ING Group released a memo on Jan. 9 entitled "Attacking Iran: The market impact of a surprise Israeli strike on its nuclear facilities."
ING is a global financial services company of Dutch origin that includes banking, insurance, and other divisions. The report was authored by Charles Robinson, the Chief Economist for Emerging Europe, Middle East, and Africa. He also authored an update in ING's daily update Prophet that further underscored the bank's perception of the risks of an attack.
ING's Robertson admitted that an attack on Iran was "high impact, if low probability," but explained some of the reasons why a strike might go forward. The Jan. 9 dispatch, describes Israel as "not prepared to accept the same doctrine of ‘mutually assured destruction’ that kept the peace during the Cold War. Israel is adamant that this is not an option for such a geographically small country....So if Israel is convinced Iran is aiming to develop a nuclear weapon, it must presumably act at some point."
so, why now...?
In his Jan. 15 update, Robertson points to a political reason that could make the assault more likely - personnel changes in the Bush administration may have sidelined opponents of attacking Iran.
if my fairy godmother were to suddenly appear and grant me one wish, it would be for bush and cheney to resign - tomorrow... better yet, how about right now...? Submit To Propeller
Tweet