More on justice for Bush and his gang
kagro x has a nice analysis over at daily kos... he cites this from time magazine...
and then has this to say...
very true... and that's why we need to keep impeachment on the table...
absolutely... Submit To Propeller
Tweet
[W]hen it comes to deploying its Executive power, which is dear to Bush's understanding of the presidency, the President's team has been planning for what one strategist describes as "a cataclysmic fight to the death" over the balance between Congress and the White House if confronted with congressional subpoenas it deems inappropriate. The strategist says the Bush team is "going to assert that power, and they're going to fight it all the way to the Supreme Court on every issue, every time, no compromise, no discussion, no negotiation."
and then has this to say...
The problem is that there's really no independent Constitutional or legal reason why executive branch officials would be compelled to respond to a Congressional subpoena. Congress has only very limited investigatory powers, which the courts typically limit to oversight that has a direct or at least colorable relation to proposed legislation.
very true... and that's why we need to keep impeachment on the table...
Just as it's the threat of a filibuster that ultimately provides the "power" that makes the "Senatorial hold" possible, so is impeachment the power that makes Congressional subpoena power possible for use against the executive branch.
And we all want that, right?
absolutely... Submit To Propeller
Tweet