Larisa asks the question that's been troubling me as well

i've made no secret out of the fact that my fundamental professional skill is that of pattern recognition... i've been intensely focused on putting the pieces of the bushco pattern together since that criminal regime was installed against the wishes of the majority of the american people by the scotus decision of 12 december 2000... enough pieces are now on the table to make a reasonably cogent guess as to what the complete picture looks like... god help us all, i hope i am wrong... i hope larisa is wrong, but one can't deny the facts...

If there is no insurrection, then why suspend habeus corpus? Unless it is a contingency plan for a possible insurrection. Why pass this before the election, urgently, as though the country were on fire and despite the begging of the world? Perhaps the contingency planning for an insurrection is taking into account what the exit polls will once again fail to deliver. Perhaps the answer is as simple as it is historically supportable: (a) if the GOP cannot give up control of Congress, (b) and there is ample proof that they will retain control of Congress through election fraud, then (c) faced with a no longer sedated public, this brave new America of the GOP might require extreme measures in order to secure peace in the event of an uprising, (d) perhaps through something like domestic policing measures.

please, please, let it not be true... let the dems score a clean win next tuesday, and let's begin the process of climbing out of this terribly dark, dank, noxious hole...

Submit To Propeller
Tweet