The traditional Dem establishment is taking a big hit
it looks like the lieberman exorcism has unleashed a fury of discussion on how we can make the democratic party a party of principle rather than just another money-making tool... there's three, count 'em, three, dem-establishment-needs-to-go-down stories this morning in alternet alone...
one...
two...
three...
one of the reasons i lost my interest in anything political in the u.s. for a ten-year stretch up until bush's silent coup in 2000 was precisely what's described above - a blurred division between what i considered my party and the money-grubbing, power-hungry, cozy insider world that was running it with the line of distinction between the dems and the r's blurring into invisibility... it's time to take it back... Submit To Propeller
Tweet
one...
The Top 10 Corporate Democrats-For-Hire
Lieberman is more than an ally in the Bush administration's dissembling on Iraq. He is yet another example of someone who came to Washington as a purported idealist and turned into a creature of the capital's big-money culture.
[...]
Details on this can be found in a report from the Real News Project, a new nonprofit noncommercial investigative reporting outfit I founded. RealNews examined the track records of prominent Washington Democrats, consultants, advertising and public relations executives, lobbyists, attorneys and the like who have close connections to the top circles of their party. Many of them served in the Clinton-Gore White House, and many of them will likely be tapped should a Democrat be elected in 2008 and have considerable influence in a future Democratic-controlled Congress.
We scrutinized scores of Washington Dems and found many ensconced in firms working to advance corporate agendas that don't look that different from policy we see emanating from the Bush administration.
two...
Firing Squad Looms for the Dem Party Oligarchy
Question: Are bloggers too powerful?
Answer: Do I think they're important? Yes. Do I think the [bloggers] and Al Sharpton alone are the future of the Democratic Party? No! Welcome in, contribute, but it's about winning in November and moving the country forward, not about a firing squad in a circle. -- Q&A with U.S. representative Rahm Emmanuel, Aug. 28 issue of New York magazine
These DLC types are amazing, they really are. Their pathology is unique; they all secretly worship the guilt-by-association tactics of Lee Atwater and Karl Rove, but unlike those two, not one of them has enough balls to take being thought of as the bad guy by the general public. So instead of telling big, bold whoppers right out in the open, they're forever coming out with backhanded little asides like this one, apparently in the hope that only your subconscious will notice. I won't be surprised if they respond to the next electoral loss by a DLC candidate by having Bruce Reed argue in the Wall Street Journal that "bloggers, Queer Eye, and Arabs with syphilis are not the future of the Democratic Party."
Then there is the phrase, "Welcome in, contribute, but..."
Welcome in? What is this, a political party, or a house in the fucking Hamptons? Who died and made these people gatekeepers to anything?
three...
Warring Over the Heart of the Party
Make no mistake about it: The fight within the Democratic Party over the Iraq war is as important as it is real. This is no sideshow between seasoned Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.) and upstart challenger Ned Lamont, between pros and bloggers, or lefties and conservatives within the party.
No, this battle transcends those labels and cuts to the obligation of politicians to be honest with the public. Indeed, a seasoned conservative Democratic politician should recognize the war in Iraq for the unmitigated disaster it is and seek to properly place responsibility for it on the incumbent Republican president.
It is one thing for Democrats like Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts to admit that they bought into the Bush administration's lies about Saddam Hussein's alleged nuke program and partnership with Al Qaeda and to now seek to make amends by working to bring the troops home. It is quite another, as Lieberman has, to continue to defend as wise this patently absurd betrayal of the public interest. And it moves from dumb to evil to claim that those like Lamont who dare tell the truth are giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
one of the reasons i lost my interest in anything political in the u.s. for a ten-year stretch up until bush's silent coup in 2000 was precisely what's described above - a blurred division between what i considered my party and the money-grubbing, power-hungry, cozy insider world that was running it with the line of distinction between the dems and the r's blurring into invisibility... it's time to take it back... Submit To Propeller
Tweet