Specter's amnesty: "...so reprehensible that it is difficult to describe"
bushco must be holding some really juicy stuff on specter... to watch him pee his pants every time the white house looks in his direction is truly pathetic...
yes, glenn greenwald, you've got it exactly right... (i wonder if greenwald's on the no-fly list...)
the white house must have some really juicy stuff on a lot of folks in congress, come to think of it... Submit To Propeller
Tweet
A law which makes it "an option" -- rather than a requirement -- for the Government to obtain a warrant before eavesdropping is about as meaningless of a law as can be imagined.
But that complete change of heart by Specter is not even nearly the most corrupt part of his proposed bill. For pure corruption and constitutional abdication, nothing could match this:Another part of the Specter bill would grant blanket amnesty to anyone who authorized warrantless surveillance under presidential authority, a provision that seems to ensure that no one would be held criminally liable if the current program is found illegal under present law.
The idea that the President's allies in Congress would enact legislation which expressly shields government officials, including the President, from criminal liability for past lawbreaking is so reprehensible that it is difficult to describe.
yes, glenn greenwald, you've got it exactly right... (i wonder if greenwald's on the no-fly list...)
Specter receives substantial criticism because of the flamboyant way in which he engages in what can only be described as sado-masochistic rituals with the administration. He pretends to exercise independence only to get beaten into extreme submission, and then returns eagerly for more. It is as unpleasant to watch as it is damaging to our country. But Specter's unique psychological dramas should not obscure the fact that it is the entire Congress which has failed in its responsibilities to take a stand against this President's lawbreaking and abuses, and there is plenty of blame to go around in both parties. The reason the President has been allowed to exert precisely the type of unrestrained power which the Founders sought, first and foremost, to avoid, is because the Congress has allowed him to.
the white house must have some really juicy stuff on a lot of folks in congress, come to think of it... Submit To Propeller
Tweet