More on the latest memo from Robert Parry
he's talking war crimes...
parry goes on to point out a staggering revelation by condi this past weekend that has gone virtually unnoticed in the media...
yep, the u.s. is in the hands of criminals, no doubt about it... but, since the u.s. doesn't recognize the international criminal court in the hague, i guess george and tony will continue to enjoy the emoluments of unfettered power... Submit To Propeller
Tweet
In a world where might did not make right, George W. Bush, Tony Blair and their key enablers would be in shackles before a war crimes tribunal at the Hague, rather than sitting in the White House, 10 Downing Street or some other comfortable environs in Washington and London.
[...]
Beyond more proof that Bush has lied consistently about Iraq, the Jan. 31, 2003, memo represents striking evidence that Bush, Blair and their top assistants violated the Nuremberg Principles and the U.N. Charter by launching an aggressive war against Iraq.
While many Americans think of the Nuremberg trials after World War II as just holding Nazi leaders accountable for genocide, a major charge against Adolf Hitler’s henchmen was the crime of aggressive war. Later, that principle was embodied in the United Nations Charter, forbidding armed aggression by one state against another.
[...]
The British memos, combined with public statements by Bush and his senior aides, represent a prima-facie case that Bush, Blair and others violated the Nuremberg Principles and the U.N. Charter, to which the United States was a founding signatory.
parry goes on to point out a staggering revelation by condi this past weekend that has gone virtually unnoticed in the media...
“If you really believe that the only thing that happened on 9/11 was people flew airplanes into buildings, I think you have a very narrow view of what we faced on 9/11,” Rice said. “We faced the outcome of an ideology of hatred throughout the Middle East that had to be dealt with. Saddam Hussein was a part of that old Middle East. The new Iraq will be a part of the new Middle East, and we will all be safer.”
Rice’s argument – that Bush has the right to invade any country that he feels is part of a culture that might show hostility toward the United States – represents the most expansive justification to date for launching the Iraq War.
It goes well beyond waging “preemptive” or even “predictive” war. Rice is asserting a U.S. right to inflict death and destruction on Muslim countries as part of a social-engineering experiment to eradicate their perceived cultural and political tendencies toward hatred.
yep, the u.s. is in the hands of criminals, no doubt about it... but, since the u.s. doesn't recognize the international criminal court in the hague, i guess george and tony will continue to enjoy the emoluments of unfettered power... Submit To Propeller
Tweet