Blog Flux Directory Subscribe in NewsGator Online Subscribe with Bloglines http://www.wikio.com Blog directory
And, yes, I DO take it personally: Each day, a new height for hypocrisy [UPDATE][UPDATE2]
Mandy: Great blog!
Mark: Thanks to all the contributors on this blog. When I want to get information on the events that really matter, I come here.
Penny: I'm glad I found your blog (from a comment on Think Progress), it's comprehensive and very insightful.
Eric: Nice site....I enjoyed it and will be back.
nora kelly: I enjoy your site. Keep it up! I particularly like your insights on Latin America.
Alison: Loquacious as ever with a touch of elegance -- & right on target as usual!
"Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it."
- Noam Chomsky
Send tips and other comments to: profmarcus2010@yahoo.com /* ---- overrides for post page ---- */ .post { padding: 0; border: none; }

Friday, May 20, 2005

Each day, a new height for hypocrisy [UPDATE][UPDATE2]

yes, the u.s. is angry, ANGRY, over photos that "appeared to breach Geneva Convention rules on the humane treatment of prisoners of war."

Example

it's almost beyond belief what these people will say... after declaring geneva invalid, after declaring that detainees were not prisoners of war, after authoring interrogation techniques that led directly to prisoner abuse, after photos documented the abuse, after steadfastly refusing to accept any accountability for prisoner torture, to now claim that a picture of saddam in his tidy whiteys violates geneva takes bizarre and unbelievable to a whole new level... a statement from the the u.s. military in iraq said, "This lapse is being aggressively investigated."

[UPDATE]

"I don't think a photo inspires murders. I think they (insurgents) are inspired by an ideology that is so barbaric and backwards that it's hard for many in the western world to comprehend how they think," Bush told reporters at the White House when asked about the impact of the photos on the Iraqi insurgency.

oh... so let me see if i understand this correctly... a PHOTO doesn't inspire murders but a MAGAZINE ARTICLE does...? and calling them "barbaric and backwards" probably doesn't have any effect at all...

[UPDATE2]

we've passed from the bizarre and hypocritical to the positively ridiculous...

Lawyers representing Saddam Hussein plan to sue the British tabloid that published intimate photos of the deposed Iraqi dictator, it was reported, quoting the head of the defence team.

Submit To Propeller


And, yes, I DO take it personally home page